The idea behind “shareholder activism” is that the sharehodlers of a company excercise their influence to effect policy changes at the corporate level that reflect environmenatal, social or any other issue. It’s really a very neat way of going about it because, as owners of the company, shareholders have every right to have their voice heard, and arguably have a more effective voice than those outside the company.
This is an interesting article in E magazine that outlines some of the basics. In particular the article talks about Green Century funds who have persuaded companies such as Whole Foods and Apple Computer to take more proactive steps toward environmental transparency and better recycling policies. And why not? In the long term sense that sort of policy is bound to benefit the shareholders and general public alike by providing for a better environment – if not also producing better returns financially.









Comments
February 07, 2006 at 16:33 pm PST | green LA girl writes:
My IRA’s at Green Century :) It’s cool cuz their website details all the stuff they’re doing and planning to do in terms of shareholder advocacy though.
Still, I wonder where you can draw the line — I’d be a lil shocked if Green Century decided to invest in Walmart, say…
February 08, 2006 at 8:29 am PST | Mark Brandon writes:
My apologies for the shameless plug-of-a-comment to this story. My firm, First Sustainable, caters to socially responsible investors. We provide the latest data on proxies, resolutions, and so forth that can help shareholders make their voices known. Not to denigrate Green Century’s good work, but the problem with SRI mutual funds is that you have to buy in to someone else’s definition of social responsibility.
Mark Brandon
Sustainable Log – News and Views for Socially Responsible Investors
http://sustainablelog.blogspot.com
http://www.firstsustainable.com
When you subscribe to Sustainable Log, we give $1 to Alternative Gifts International in support of a cause of your choice.