<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Hot War: In Business At The Front Line</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2006/04/the-hot-war-in-business-at-the-front-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2006/04/the-hot-war-in-business-at-the-front-line/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Lea Go</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2006/04/the-hot-war-in-business-at-the-front-line/comment-page-1/#comment-13843</link> <dc:creator>Lea Go</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:31:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2006/04/the-hot-war-in-business-at-the-front-line/#comment-13843</guid> <description>Greetings,
As what i read on this posted article, i found out the informativeness of this
kind of topic. For that reason i opened up an idea and some knowledge in this
field. well, you made just did a great job..more power!
sincerely,
Lea Go
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dogcontainmentfence-4less.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dog Containment Fence&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,<br
/> As what i read on this posted article, i found out the informativeness of this<br
/> kind of topic. For that reason i opened up an idea and some knowledge in this<br
/> field. well, you made just did a great job..more power!<br
/> sincerely,<br
/> Lea Go<br
/> <a
href="http://www.dogcontainmentfence-4less.com" rel="nofollow">Dog Containment Fence</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Laumer</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2006/04/the-hot-war-in-business-at-the-front-line/comment-page-1/#comment-13842</link> <dc:creator>John Laumer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:42:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2006/04/the-hot-war-in-business-at-the-front-line/#comment-13842</guid> <description>Yes. The contradiction you point out was unintended.  Clearer writing would have helped the arguement.  &quot;Hid behind&quot; is the key phrase.  I have been to such negotiations where the regs, infrastructure, taxes, capital cost, and labor pool that was all that ever came up.  Life cycle perspectives only surface when a local official presses the point.  Glossing over more subtle or uncommonly considered aspects of risk is typical (or has been up to now).  Folks are getting used to inquiring about toxic byproducts of course; but the rest is really novel and that was my focus. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. The contradiction you point out was unintended.  Clearer writing would have helped the arguement.  &#8220;Hid behind&#8221; is the key phrase.  I have been to such negotiations where the regs, infrastructure, taxes, capital cost, and labor pool that was all that ever came up.  Life cycle perspectives only surface when a local official presses the point.  Glossing over more subtle or uncommonly considered aspects of risk is typical (or has been up to now).  Folks are getting used to inquiring about toxic byproducts of course; but the rest is really novel and that was my focus.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Schiller Thurkettle</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2006/04/the-hot-war-in-business-at-the-front-line/comment-page-1/#comment-13841</link> <dc:creator>Schiller Thurkettle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:32:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2006/04/the-hot-war-in-business-at-the-front-line/#comment-13841</guid> <description>Friend,
I find it hard to reconcile these two statements in your post:
&quot;Prospects are good for any business which can substantially shorten parts, or all, of it’s supply chains.&quot;
and
&quot;Those which hide behind the traditional “cost of regulations, capital, equipment, and labor” approach will not [receive the benefits].&quot;
Doesn&#039;t one translate into the other and vice versa? At least, both seem to be from the same page of the same business model.
Schiller. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friend,<br
/> I find it hard to reconcile these two statements in your post:<br
/> &#8220;Prospects are good for any business which can substantially shorten parts, or all, of it’s supply chains.&#8221;<br
/> and<br
/> &#8220;Those which hide behind the traditional “cost of regulations, capital, equipment, and labor” approach will not [receive the benefits].&#8221;<br
/> Doesn&#8217;t one translate into the other and vice versa? At least, both seem to be from the same page of the same business model.<br
/> Schiller.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 265/267 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 02:02:29 -->
