On Saturday, July 29th, there was a town hall style meeting to discuss the state of research into a bus rapid transit system along Geary Boulevard in San Francisco. A lot of community members turned out, and there was a productive conversation. If you’d like some context, here’s Nick’s introduction to the proposed Geary BRT.
The planners and consultants involved in this process should be commended for identifying a great opportunity. Their presentation was impressive. BRT is not a major change – in fact it conservatively builds on infrastructure and capacity that already exists. Lovely. Let’s get it done.
Unfortunately it seems that the overwhelming inertia of the governmental process has unnecessarily postponed this concept for years. The feasibility study is considering 2011 as a target launch date. For anyone with experience in transit systems infrastructure, you might question why it should take 5 years to build new bus shelters along one of the city’s key transit corridors.
Apparently that’s just how it goes in San Francisco.
For details of the proposed “study schedule”, you can scroll half way down this page at SFCTA.org.
I understand and appreciate a rigorous planning process. The proposed timeframe for BRT implementation is outrageous. But why are they moving so slowly? This is one bus route. This incremental change to bus service is hardly going to affect San Francisco’s contribution to global warming. Stop inviting the public to debate issues that aren’t even debatable. Everyone supports BRT. I repeat, Let’s get it done.
I’m happy with San Francisco. I love the city. Hurrah, good job, now get to work already. 5 years and a lot of planning resources to incrementally improve one city bus route is an overly indulgent timeframe, don’t you think?
This guest Triple Pundit column was written by Jeffrey Osborne of the San Francisco management consulting firm Plan Resonate. Have ideas you’d like to see discussed at Triple Pundit? We’d love to see them. Email Nick (nick2 at 646industries).