<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes On Greenwashing and Green Scamming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/02/forbes-on-greenwashing-and-green-scamming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/02/forbes-on-greenwashing-and-green-scamming/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:05:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/02/forbes-on-greenwashing-and-green-scamming/comment-page-1/#comment-14519</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2007/02/forbes-on-greenwashing-and-green-scamming/#comment-14519</guid>
		<description>I think cynicism over green washing can be beneficial to a point to provide quality control.  There are so few well established and understood standards, such as LEED (leadership in energy and efficient design) or ISO 14001.  A healthy dose of cynicism may do some good.  What I tend to find less productive is when motives are questioned.  I don&#039;t really care why Walmart is going green; the impact is what matters.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cynicism over green washing can be beneficial to a point to provide quality control.  There are so few well established and understood standards, such as LEED (leadership in energy and efficient design) or ISO 14001.  A healthy dose of cynicism may do some good.  What I tend to find less productive is when motives are questioned.  I don&#8217;t really care why Walmart is going green; the impact is what matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Snodgrass</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/02/forbes-on-greenwashing-and-green-scamming/comment-page-1/#comment-14518</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Snodgrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2007/02/forbes-on-greenwashing-and-green-scamming/#comment-14518</guid>
		<description>Nope, you&#039;re not hallucinating - not about this anyway, whatever else is going on is strictly your business Nick. I&#039;m in NY, we send our ne&#039;er-do-wells to NJ and FL. And for the scamming that can go on over the green movement - yes, it&#039;s a potential problem but that&#039;s also kid of a sideways compliment. Only when a movement is viewed as credible does it have the ability to be used as a front by scammers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, you&#8217;re not hallucinating &#8211; not about this anyway, whatever else is going on is strictly your business Nick. I&#8217;m in NY, we send our ne&#8217;er-do-wells to NJ and FL. And for the scamming that can go on over the green movement &#8211; yes, it&#8217;s a potential problem but that&#8217;s also kid of a sideways compliment. Only when a movement is viewed as credible does it have the ability to be used as a front by scammers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
