The global market for wind energy grew by a staggering 32% in 2006 and 41% in 2005. Meanwhile the U.S. solar photovoltaic market grew by 33% last year despite supply chain constraints, but if you live in California, this may seem like a modest estimate to you. That landscape of energy production is shifting, creating some green investment opportunities (in both meanings of the word green). The Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy fund (GAAEX) for example has a year-to-date return of 35.75% as of September 30th, while the New Alternatives fund (NALFX) has a 31.6% year-to-date return as of September 30th. Calvert launched the Global Alternative Energy Fund (CGAEX) in June and has experienced a 15.6% return.
One downside to these mutual funds is that their fees are pretty high. The A shares of NALFX and CGAEX have a purchase charge of 4.75% as well as an annual operating expense of between 1.25%-1.85%. The GAAEX however does not charge a purchase charge and has an operating expense just below 2%.
Exchange traded funds can be a nice alternative for folks looking to invest in renewable energy without high fees. Because there is a transaction fee associated with this purchase, it is important to keep those fees in check. Powershares Capital Management’s Global Clean Energy fund, Van Eck Global’s Global Alternative Energy fund and the First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge US Liquid fund were all created earlier this year. They have annual fees ranging from 0.4%-0.65%. Share must be purchased through a broker, so purchase fees depend on the broker.
The skeptic may wonders what the holdings are of such funds. Are there some “clean coal” stocks stuck in there? My findings didn’t reveal anything too suspicious. The New Alternatives fund gives