<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Water wise: Sub-surface irrigation, what&#8217;s that?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/10/water-wise-sub-surface-irrigation-whats-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/10/water-wise-sub-surface-irrigation-whats-that/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Emil Knudsen</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/10/water-wise-sub-surface-irrigation-whats-that/comment-page-1/#comment-63829</link> <dc:creator>Emil Knudsen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:13:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2007/10/water-wise-sub-surface-irrigation-whats-that/#comment-63829</guid> <description>I would like to know more about netafim and the location in Saratoga Springs Utah,  that the web site mentioned.
801-636-2456thanks,
Emil</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know more about netafim and the location in Saratoga Springs Utah,  that the web site mentioned.<br
/> 801-636-2456</p><p>thanks,<br
/> Emil</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Keating</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/10/water-wise-sub-surface-irrigation-whats-that/comment-page-1/#comment-12003</link> <dc:creator>Philip Keating</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:21:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2007/10/water-wise-sub-surface-irrigation-whats-that/#comment-12003</guid> <description>Subsurface really works great.  I have designed about 30 commercial projects using a similar product from Toro that in my opinion is a better solution.  I don&#039;t like the high concentration of hazardous chemicals in the Netafim filter.
With subsurface, uniformity is really excellent, especially on small areas where other designers typically use sprays.  I estimate 30% water savings just because of better uniformity.  Add to that no runoff, evaporation, and no need to adjust nozzles, and drip is a great solution for certain areas. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subsurface really works great.  I have designed about 30 commercial projects using a similar product from Toro that in my opinion is a better solution.  I don&#8217;t like the high concentration of hazardous chemicals in the Netafim filter.<br
/> With subsurface, uniformity is really excellent, especially on small areas where other designers typically use sprays.  I estimate 30% water savings just because of better uniformity.  Add to that no runoff, evaporation, and no need to adjust nozzles, and drip is a great solution for certain areas.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 240/241 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 00:49:26 -->
