<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shareholder Activism to the Rescue!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/12/shareholder-activism-to-the-rescue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/12/shareholder-activism-to-the-rescue/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2007/12/shareholder-activism-to-the-rescue/comment-page-1/#comment-12298</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:42:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2007/12/shareholder-activism-to-the-rescue/#comment-12298</guid> <description>It&#039;s not the shareholder&#039;s that should be shaping the decisions of a comapny, besides the shareholder&#039;s are only looking out for their investment, at whatever cost.
Just because the trend is currently a &quot;GREEN&quot; one; it does not mean that shareholders are the solution to irresponsible and polluting business practices. Especially when the only thing that shareholders see is the green in the dollar they recieve for their investment.
Rather, these articles would be far more valuable, thorough, and worth reading if they hit the bottom line of the topics discussed here. Is it not obvious that the consumer, the average &#039;Jack and Jill,&#039; are the ultimate source of &quot;green&quot; activism and implementation???? For as long as I can remember, supply is driven by demand, and I know of very few companies that exist for anything but profit in their bottom line and that or their shareholders. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the shareholder&#8217;s that should be shaping the decisions of a comapny, besides the shareholder&#8217;s are only looking out for their investment, at whatever cost.<br
/> Just because the trend is currently a &#8220;GREEN&#8221; one; it does not mean that shareholders are the solution to irresponsible and polluting business practices. Especially when the only thing that shareholders see is the green in the dollar they recieve for their investment.<br
/> Rather, these articles would be far more valuable, thorough, and worth reading if they hit the bottom line of the topics discussed here. Is it not obvious that the consumer, the average &#8216;Jack and Jill,&#8217; are the ultimate source of &#8220;green&#8221; activism and implementation???? For as long as I can remember, supply is driven by demand, and I know of very few companies that exist for anything but profit in their bottom line and that or their shareholders.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 223/224 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-09 21:55:30 -->
