<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Amazon Kindle: Save Trees, Support E-Book Readers</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-12458</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:04:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/#comment-12458</guid> <description>Ok I have been looking at buying a Kindle. However,
my question is this, I there actually less energy
being consumed my the production of the electronic device and energy consumed during use vs the production of a paperback.  I understand a tree will
die for the book but with the fact that the book can be shelved or donated to a library, its energy consumption never reoccures.  I know the ebook has an edge in distrobution, ie no trucks, stores, or employees.  But what about every-time I want to read it I must use power.  I would love to know if anyone knows of a study or if anyone knows.  Thanks in advance. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I have been looking at buying a Kindle. However,<br
/> my question is this, I there actually less energy<br
/> being consumed my the production of the electronic device and energy consumed during use vs the production of a paperback.  I understand a tree will<br
/> die for the book but with the fact that the book can be shelved or donated to a library, its energy consumption never reoccures.  I know the ebook has an edge in distrobution, ie no trucks, stores, or employees.  But what about every-time I want to read it I must use power.  I would love to know if anyone knows of a study or if anyone knows.  Thanks in advance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: odograph</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-12457</link> <dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:15:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/#comment-12457</guid> <description>I prefer my Asus Eee PC.  Much of my daily reading is from RSS feeds anyway. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer my Asus Eee PC.  Much of my daily reading is from RSS feeds anyway.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 239/240 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-09 23:48:51 -->
