<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Kindle: Save Trees, Support E-Book Readers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:54:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-12458</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/#comment-12458</guid>
		<description>Ok I have been looking at buying a Kindle. However,
my question is this, I there actually less energy
being consumed my the production of the electronic device and energy consumed during use vs the production of a paperback.  I understand a tree will
die for the book but with the fact that the book can be shelved or donated to a library, its energy consumption never reoccures.  I know the ebook has an edge in distrobution, ie no trucks, stores, or employees.  But what about every-time I want to read it I must use power.  I would love to know if anyone knows of a study or if anyone knows.  Thanks in advance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I have been looking at buying a Kindle. However,<br />
my question is this, I there actually less energy<br />
being consumed my the production of the electronic device and energy consumed during use vs the production of a paperback.  I understand a tree will<br />
die for the book but with the fact that the book can be shelved or donated to a library, its energy consumption never reoccures.  I know the ebook has an edge in distrobution, ie no trucks, stores, or employees.  But what about every-time I want to read it I must use power.  I would love to know if anyone knows of a study or if anyone knows.  Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-12457</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/amazon-kindle-save-trees-support-e-book-readers/#comment-12457</guid>
		<description>I prefer my Asus Eee PC.  Much of my daily reading is from RSS feeds anyway.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer my Asus Eee PC.  Much of my daily reading is from RSS feeds anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
