<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Compact Stellarator: Fusion reactors that produce star-like power</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/comment-page-1/#comment-12450</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/#comment-12450</guid> <description>I would like to publish or have some one exaine my newly discouverd theroey on why charged particles move when traveling in mag. field. AAlso to veiw cold fussion reactor design. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to publish or have some one exaine my newly discouverd theroey on why charged particles move when traveling in mag. field. AAlso to veiw cold fussion reactor design.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/comment-page-1/#comment-12449</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:49:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/#comment-12449</guid> <description>I would like to publish or have some one exaine my newly discouverd theroey on why charged particles move when traveling in mag. field. AAlso to veiw cold fussion reactor design. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to publish or have some one exaine my newly discouverd theroey on why charged particles move when traveling in mag. field. AAlso to veiw cold fussion reactor design.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darell</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/comment-page-1/#comment-12448</link> <dc:creator>Darell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:38:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/#comment-12448</guid> <description>I was at Princeton in 1985 and toured the Tokamak test reactor.  We were told at that time that with the rate of funding and the scientific problems that needed to be solved it would take 50 years to have a reaction that was at break even, where the energy that you were applying was equal to the energy output.  Funding for this type of research was cut.  What we see now is the UK taking that model and the research and funding it.  Was not funding our big mistake? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at Princeton in 1985 and toured the Tokamak test reactor.  We were told at that time that with the rate of funding and the scientific problems that needed to be solved it would take 50 years to have a reaction that was at break even, where the energy that you were applying was equal to the energy output.  Funding for this type of research was cut.  What we see now is the UK taking that model and the research and funding it.  Was not funding our big mistake?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Fiala</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/comment-page-1/#comment-12447</link> <dc:creator>Robert Fiala</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:43:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/#comment-12447</guid> <description>Single bubble sonoluminesences.
Up to 9000K to 15000K from an imploding bubble. Definately generates a plasma but is it fussion? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single bubble sonoluminesences.<br
/> Up to 9000K to 15000K from an imploding bubble. Definately generates a plasma but is it fussion?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Fiala</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/comment-page-1/#comment-12446</link> <dc:creator>Robert Fiala</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:43:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/#comment-12446</guid> <description>Single bubble sonoluminesences.
Up to 9000K to 15000K from an imploding bubble. Definately generates a plasma but is it fussion? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single bubble sonoluminesences.<br
/> Up to 9000K to 15000K from an imploding bubble. Definately generates a plasma but is it fussion?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/comment-page-1/#comment-12445</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:28:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/#comment-12445</guid> <description>This device in form and scale, resembles the Tokamak test reactor that Princeton was operating some 22 years ago at this same laboratory.  What is the difference or advantage of the same approach now after all this time? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This device in form and scale, resembles the Tokamak test reactor that Princeton was operating some 22 years ago at this same laboratory.  What is the difference or advantage of the same approach now after all this time?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M. Simon</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/comment-page-1/#comment-12444</link> <dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:54:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/01/compact-stellarator-fusion-reactors-that-produce-star-like-power/#comment-12444</guid> <description>This is the future of fusion in America:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2008/01/wb-7-first-plasma.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WB-7 First Plasma&lt;/a&gt;
By the time the Stellarator gets running the Bussard folks could be delivering power to the grid.
We will know in 60 to 120 days if it is a go. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the future of fusion in America:<br
/> <a
href="http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2008/01/wb-7-first-plasma.html" rel="nofollow">WB-7 First Plasma</a><br
/> By the time the Stellarator gets running the Bussard folks could be delivering power to the grid.<br
/> We will know in 60 to 120 days if it is a go.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 325/326 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 02:30:56 -->
