<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Brilliantly Simple Way to Recharge Your Batteries</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Eugene</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/comment-page-1/#comment-12749</link> <dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 20:21:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/#comment-12749</guid> <description>I think that this is a good thing, in general.
However, we should remember that what we are seeing is a cell with a recharger already included. I have to really wonder if this is actually more environmentally friendly. As each cell wears out, then each recharger will have to be thrown out or recycled.
That being said, I think that this does have something to offer, in that it might be easier to recharge the cell. We don&#039;t have to bring a seperate recharger with us, because it&#039;s already compact enough to drag along. Also, the manufacturers don&#039;t need to create some kind of a wall rat. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is a good thing, in general.<br
/> However, we should remember that what we are seeing is a cell with a recharger already included. I have to really wonder if this is actually more environmentally friendly. As each cell wears out, then each recharger will have to be thrown out or recycled.<br
/> That being said, I think that this does have something to offer, in that it might be easier to recharge the cell. We don&#8217;t have to bring a seperate recharger with us, because it&#8217;s already compact enough to drag along. Also, the manufacturers don&#8217;t need to create some kind of a wall rat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mary Jo</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/comment-page-1/#comment-12748</link> <dc:creator>Mary Jo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:29:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/#comment-12748</guid> <description>&quot;According to the site it&#039;s ready to be used again in minutes&quot;!!! Actually, the site states, &quot;the charge should take about 5 hours by USB and the light should go off when USBCELL is fully charged.&quot; ( http://usbcell.com/support/faqsection/5 ). For me, 5 hours is much more than &quot;in minutes&quot;. I don&#039;t see what&#039;s so hard about placing batteries into a recharger. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;According to the site it&#8217;s ready to be used again in minutes&#8221;!!! Actually, the site states, &#8220;the charge should take about 5 hours by USB and the light should go off when USBCELL is fully charged.&#8221; ( <a
href="http://usbcell.com/support/faqsection/5" rel="nofollow">http://usbcell.com/support/faqsection/5</a> ). For me, 5 hours is much more than &#8220;in minutes&#8221;. I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s so hard about placing batteries into a recharger.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Allen</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/comment-page-1/#comment-12747</link> <dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:14:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/#comment-12747</guid> <description>Please wait until to try it before doing the review.
&quot;According to the site it&#039;s ready to be used again in minutes&quot;
I don&#039;t mean to be cranky but I could have simply read their ad -- the review does not add any content.  I got most way done and felt like a dope for reading it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please wait until to try it before doing the review.<br
/> &#8220;According to the site it&#8217;s ready to be used again in minutes&#8221;<br
/> I don&#8217;t mean to be cranky but I could have simply read their ad &#8212; the review does not add any content.  I got most way done and felt like a dope for reading it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jhiga</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/comment-page-1/#comment-12746</link> <dc:creator>jhiga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/03/a-brilliantly-simple-way-to-recharge-your-batteries/#comment-12746</guid> <description>great idea except that usually one uses 2-4 batteries at a time...a battery-charger allows for recharging in multiples. charging them one at a time would not be tolerable  &quot;for those short of patience.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great idea except that usually one uses 2-4 batteries at a time&#8230;a battery-charger allows for recharging in multiples. charging them one at a time would not be tolerable  &#8220;for those short of patience.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 274/275 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 01:31:11 -->
