<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greenwash, Green Certification and Consumer Responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/greenwash-green-certification-and-consumer-responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/greenwash-green-certification-and-consumer-responsibility/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:33:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brie Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/03/greenwash-green-certification-and-consumer-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-12727</link>
		<dc:creator>Brie Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/03/greenwash-green-certification-and-consumer-responsibility/#comment-12727</guid>
		<description>Great article! The Green Electronics Council has looked at the issues with recycling when forming EPEAT criteria. One of the required criteria for EPEAT products is that manufacturers provide a product take-back service. Purchasers will have the option &quot;purchase, at a competitive price, a take-back or recycling service that meets the U.S. EPA environmental standard defined in the &quot;Plug-In to eCycling Guidelines for Materials Management,&quot; published May 2004.&quot;
http://www.epeat.net/Criteria.aspx#criteriatable
It also addresses the challenges of recycling equipment with required and optional criteria that manufactures build their equipment for easy disassembly.
EPEAT really is a great tool that could serve as a model for how to guide manufacturers to take responsibility for their products and communicate to their customers as well. Further, it&#039;s easy for purchasers of institutions to require the purchase of EPEAT equipment giving the industry further incentive to build products to higher standards.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! The Green Electronics Council has looked at the issues with recycling when forming EPEAT criteria. One of the required criteria for EPEAT products is that manufacturers provide a product take-back service. Purchasers will have the option &#8220;purchase, at a competitive price, a take-back or recycling service that meets the U.S. EPA environmental standard defined in the &#8220;Plug-In to eCycling Guidelines for Materials Management,&#8221; published May 2004.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.epeat.net/Criteria.aspx#criteriatable" rel="nofollow">http://www.epeat.net/Criteria.aspx#criteriatable</a><br />
It also addresses the challenges of recycling equipment with required and optional criteria that manufactures build their equipment for easy disassembly.<br />
EPEAT really is a great tool that could serve as a model for how to guide manufacturers to take responsibility for their products and communicate to their customers as well. Further, it&#8217;s easy for purchasers of institutions to require the purchase of EPEAT equipment giving the industry further incentive to build products to higher standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
