Comments on: Wall Street Journal editorial page: A glimpse behind the curtain

By: Rob

Rob — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:09:42 +0000

LOL Greenhouse gasses. I wonder what really puts the “Green” in “green” energy, I can tell you it’s probably the same green that lines Al gore’s pockets.

By: Jasper

Jasper — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:36:25 +0000

For one he didn’t say “everyone agrees Kansas needs more baseload coal-fired electricity”, he said “they need more baseload capacity”, which is probably true. Please do not misquote people, even if they are talking heads for some interest group.
The second video seems broken for me, its 6seconds of some old movie.
Anyway, the video as far as i have seen it does paint a rather one-sided picture of the issue. I wonder why people always say green energy is not viable, instead of how much more we are willing to pay for it. Frankly, i think it is worth quiet a lot.
CO2 obviously is not toxic at low concentrations, so doesnt pollute locally. The point is though, it is a greenhouse gas, whining about it not being toxic doesnt change that.

By: Matthew Lewis

Matthew Lewis — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:10:17 +0000

Thanks D’Lorien – What’s the source for that site? Hard to tell from the link you posted.

By: D'Lorien Sutter

D'Lorien Sutter — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:05:05 +0000

Matt – check out the new “facelift” that Rupert Murdoch’s giving to the journal. Supposedly tomorrow:
LINK HERE