« Back to Home Page

Sign up for the 3p daily dispatch:

Environmental Groups Lead Effort to Remove Nuclear Power Subsidies from Lieberman-Warner

| Saturday May 17th, 2008 | 3 Comments

MrBurns.gif
Friends of the Earth and five other national environmental and public interest groups are stepping up efforts to block what they contend are at least $544 billion in taxpayer subsidies for the nuclear power industry included in the Lieberman-Warner bill, which is expected to be considered by the Senate in early June.
The subsidies are couched in vague language in a category called “zero and low carbon energy technologies,” according to FoE and lobby group members, which includes Beyond Nuclear, Environmental Working Group, Greenpeace, Nucelar Information and Resource Service and Public Citizen.
“Nuclear is the only energy industry that could fall under this category that does not have a specific carve elsewhere; funding for renewable energy is identified separately in the bill,” according to an FoE press release.
“Although the word ‚Äònuclear’ has been carefully omitted from the bill, it is clear that this is a covert attempt to bolster a failing nuclear power industry in the name of addressing climate change,” Brent Blackwelder, president of Friends of the Earth stated. “It’s time to focus on real global warming solutions like solar, wind and energy efficiency, not to further fatten the moribund nuclear calf.”
“After 50 years of unresolved safety and waste disposal issues, it perplexes many Americans why Congress would support massive subsidies for the nuclear industry,” added John Passacantando, Executive Director of Greenpeace USA.
“Nuclear power is a dirty and dangerous distraction from real global warming solutions. When both Wall Street and Warren Buffet think nuclear is a risky investment, Congress should not waste American tax dollars to further subsidize this 1950s technology.”


▼▼▼      3 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup
  • http://blog.sustainablemiddleclass.com John Freeland

    Though it is touted as emission-free, nuclear power has a big carbon footprint as discussed here:
    http://blog.sustainablemiddleclass.com/?p=113.
    This carbon cost, like the subsidy in the Leiberman-Warner bill, is hidden by ignoring the entire nuclear process starting with mining and ending with permanent disposal (vitrification and burial).
    A good summary on this issue is found in a powerpoint presentation prepared by PeakOil, here:
    http://www.peakoil.org.au/does_nuclear_energy_produce_no_co2.ppt

  • Anonymous

    screw you

  • Hero

    91 chevy silverado headlight repair
    mass migration souther california 1920
    www ticketfastpay com decatur
    351c keith black hypereutectic piston max rpm
    mjr theater
    chevy donks for sale cars
    ver videos calientes de noelia gordas cojiendo
    htfd courant obituaries oct 2009
    ge universal remote rc24912c codes
    chinas cojiendo videos gratis
    fotosde panochas free
    crossman stinger s30 shotgun parts
    genatal piercings
    miller furnace electrode gap
    uniclave noticias
    datviet adult
    chamillion camaro on dubs
    grizzly dip can opener
    dbz mugen
    lympathic worksheet

  • Pingback: Will UK Subsidize New Nuclear Power Plants?()