Comments on: Environmental Groups Lead Effort to Remove Nuclear Power Subsidies from Lieberman-Warner

By: Will UK Subsidize New Nuclear Power Plants?

Will UK Subsidize New Nuclear Power Plants? — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:03:22 +0000

[...] Renewable energy investment has been flagged as an “early high priority” by the GIB. Nuclear power’s role within GIB investments remains uncertain. Yet after top-level officials spoke out against nuclear following the disaster in Japan, many suspect it will not be included in GIB funded activities nor qualify for future subsidies. [...]

By: Hero

Hero — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:46:12 +0000

91 chevy silverado headlight repair mass migration souther california 1920 www ticketfastpay com decatur 351c keith black hypereutectic piston max rpm mjr theater chevy donks for sale cars ver videos calientes de noelia gordas cojiendo htfd courant obituaries oct 2009 ge universal remote rc24912c codes chinas cojiendo videos gratis fotosde panochas free crossman stinger s30 shotgun parts genatal piercings miller furnace electrode gap uniclave noticias datviet adult chamillion camaro on dubs grizzly dip can opener dbz mugen lympathic worksheet

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:35:00 +0000

screw you

By: John Freeland

John Freeland — Sun, 18 May 2008 11:41:18 +0000

Though it is touted as emission-free, nuclear power has a big carbon footprint as discussed here:
http://blog.sustainablemiddleclass.com/?p=113.
This carbon cost, like the subsidy in the Leiberman-Warner bill, is hidden by ignoring the entire nuclear process starting with mining and ending with permanent disposal (vitrification and burial).
A good summary on this issue is found in a powerpoint presentation prepared by PeakOil, here:
http://www.peakoil.org.au/does_nuclear_energy_produce_no_co2.ppt