« Back to Home Page

Radical Solution to Climate Change: Global Dimming through Sulphur

| Thursday May 22nd, 2008 | 7 Comments

dimming.jpgTim Flannery, author of The Weather Makers and Australia’s best-known global warming expert, yesterday released a new climate forecast. Since his last major forecast in 2005, he has projected a direr outcome and in turn suggests consideration of radical solutions to the global warming phenomenon, including ‚Äòdimming’ through sulphur.
Professor Flannery spoke at a business and sustainability conference at Parliament House in Australia on Monday. He has brought to national media attention new science results that show how the world is more susceptible to and affected by greenhouse gas emissions; more so than has ever been considered previously. For Flannery, greenhouse gases that are present in the atmosphere today are already having too great an impact, regardless of changes made to emission levels in the future.

“The current burden of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is in fact more than sufficient to cause catastrophic climate change”


Cutting emissions is no longer considered sufficient. We now face the task of how to remove greenhouse gases out of the air with scientific solutions. The need to act is “extremely urgent” and Prof. Flannery has suggested a range of solutions, including dimming via the use of Sulphur.
By inserting sulphur gas into the earth’s stratosphere it would be possible to protect the earth from the sun’s rays and slow global warming, he has predicted. Professor Flannery admitted that this would

“change the colour of the sky” and that there would be risks associated with this process.

One alternative proposed is for sulphur to be injected into the atmosphere by incorporating it with jet fuel. Professor Flannery advised that this technique would need to be implemented in five years time, especially if the current path of polluting and inability to combat a warming globe continues.
Other measures promoted by Professor Flannery were presented at the conference, such as the conversion of carbon from the air to charcoal, increased economic incentives for planting forests in tropical zones by poor farmers (through the eBay scheme for example) and underground storage of carbon emissions. He also specifically mentioned the impact of industrialisation in China and encouraged technology sharing by nations to manage climate impact.


▼▼▼      7 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup

Comments

  1. May 24, 2008 at 15:05 pm PDT | Danielle writes:

    This is truly mad science and could do far more harm than good

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  2. May 24, 2008 at 23:46 pm PDT | Sunson writes:

    What next after scorching the sky? Making human fuel-cells (a la the Matrix) because plants can no longer do photosynthesis?

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  3. May 26, 2008 at 4:48 am PDT | Anonymous writes:

    When i think sulphur i think acid rain… not sure of the chemistry behind it all but even if the result isn’t acid rain, dumping More chemicals into the air is downright ridiculous!

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  4. May 27, 2008 at 4:21 am PDT | Anonymous writes:

    Is this bloke completely mad?! Pumping sulphur into our atmosphere would be disastrous and the resulting acid raid would probably kill the dwindling crops needed to feed this slowly starving planet. I hope no-one takes him seriously for all our sakes!

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  5. September 21, 2008 at 5:08 am PDT | Anonymous writes:

    This is best solution for global warming I heard so far. congratulations!
    Cutting down CO2 emissions is a story for little children – It is not going to help us, even if we cut completely.
    Let’s face it – we’ve lost our virginity with nature, let’s make a serious plan how to live on.

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  6. February 03, 2009 at 7:36 am PDT | carlo writes:

    Well, we have to keep in mind that traditional methods of preventing global warming from happening have shown to be sucessful- but not sucessful enough. I think it’s time we look into more alternative, and possibly radical solutions to stop global warming.

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  7. April 16, 2009 at 6:45 am PDT | Anonymous writes:

    If I hadn’t heard of him before I’d think this was some daft movie in production. It seems his plan would be to kill off the lot of us.
    What a psychotic idiot. Does he not understand the role the sun plays in agriculture? Or that overheated Venus has sulphur clouds?

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

Leave a Reply

  1. Please leave an intelligent comment. You are welcomed to link to your company or website, but entirely self promotional posts will be marked as spam.
There are 3 ways to comment on 3P

2. Facebook Users

Login to your Facebook account

3. Members

Register for an account or login.

Subscribe to Comments

  1. No trackbacks yet