<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shell Discusses Global Energy Scenarios in First Live Web Chat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/shell-discusses-global-energy-scenarios-in-first-live-web-chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/shell-discusses-global-energy-scenarios-in-first-live-web-chat/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:33:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Shires</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/shell-discusses-global-energy-scenarios-in-first-live-web-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-10760</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Shires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/05/shell-discusses-global-energy-scenarios-in-first-live-web-chat/#comment-10760</guid>
		<description>Considering the resources Shell has at its disposal, this still seems like a bit of a cop-out in my opinion.  I&#039;m happy to hear they are accepting the existence of these various challenges we face, but I don&#039;t see them doing a whole lot to shift us from the mass-consumption status quo.
Obviously, as an oil company, that would be difficult without radically restructuring their incentives. But they still come across as an inertia filled bad guy here...  I&#039;m not saying they have to be the lead in changing the world, but I know they can do better!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the resources Shell has at its disposal, this still seems like a bit of a cop-out in my opinion.  I&#8217;m happy to hear they are accepting the existence of these various challenges we face, but I don&#8217;t see them doing a whole lot to shift us from the mass-consumption status quo.<br />
Obviously, as an oil company, that would be difficult without radically restructuring their incentives. But they still come across as an inertia filled bad guy here&#8230;  I&#8217;m not saying they have to be the lead in changing the world, but I know they can do better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
