<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shell Discusses Global Energy Scenarios in First Live Web Chat</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/shell-discusses-global-energy-scenarios-in-first-live-web-chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/shell-discusses-global-energy-scenarios-in-first-live-web-chat/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Terry Shires</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/shell-discusses-global-energy-scenarios-in-first-live-web-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-10760</link> <dc:creator>Terry Shires</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:49:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/05/shell-discusses-global-energy-scenarios-in-first-live-web-chat/#comment-10760</guid> <description>Considering the resources Shell has at its disposal, this still seems like a bit of a cop-out in my opinion.  I&#039;m happy to hear they are accepting the existence of these various challenges we face, but I don&#039;t see them doing a whole lot to shift us from the mass-consumption status quo.
Obviously, as an oil company, that would be difficult without radically restructuring their incentives. But they still come across as an inertia filled bad guy here...  I&#039;m not saying they have to be the lead in changing the world, but I know they can do better! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the resources Shell has at its disposal, this still seems like a bit of a cop-out in my opinion.  I&#8217;m happy to hear they are accepting the existence of these various challenges we face, but I don&#8217;t see them doing a whole lot to shift us from the mass-consumption status quo.<br
/> Obviously, as an oil company, that would be difficult without radically restructuring their incentives. But they still come across as an inertia filled bad guy here&#8230;  I&#8217;m not saying they have to be the lead in changing the world, but I know they can do better!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 223/224 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 02:20:37 -->
