<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: U.S. Oil Subsidies Need to Go</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Pressure Builds to End $4 Billion in Taxpayer Subsidies for Oil Companies</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-80508</link> <dc:creator>Pressure Builds to End $4 Billion in Taxpayer Subsidies for Oil Companies</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 09:07:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/#comment-80508</guid> <description>[...] to defend the oil subsidies, federal legislators have taken notice of the public mood. Calls for legislation to end subsidies for oil companies go back at least three years ago during the last spike in gas prices and oil company [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to defend the oil subsidies, federal legislators have taken notice of the public mood. Calls for legislation to end subsidies for oil companies go back at least three years ago during the last spike in gas prices and oil company [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Liz</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-10806</link> <dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:07:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/#comment-10806</guid> <description>This is too bad for the US .
Apparently the German government is subsidizing solar; everyone and their aunt is putting in some kind of solar panel, even renting a neighbors roof, and this is  pushing the industry  and the developement of the tyechnology forward over there. The  Germans  are  also buying all the cutting edge technology made / produced here , but barely sold  here because of the lack of support and incentives.  Duh. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is too bad for the US .<br
/> Apparently the German government is subsidizing solar; everyone and their aunt is putting in some kind of solar panel, even renting a neighbors roof, and this is  pushing the industry  and the developement of the tyechnology forward over there. The  Germans  are  also buying all the cutting edge technology made / produced here , but barely sold  here because of the lack of support and incentives.  Duh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tayko Long</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-10805</link> <dc:creator>Tayko Long</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 23:48:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/#comment-10805</guid> <description>The real subsidy that needs to be eliminated is US military spending.  Most of our military spending is done on behalf of oil companies.  Eliminate a nice chunk of that and you could lower taxes significantly - yes the price at the pump would go up, but that would just reflect reality instead of being hidden in other taxes! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real subsidy that needs to be eliminated is US military spending.  Most of our military spending is done on behalf of oil companies.  Eliminate a nice chunk of that and you could lower taxes significantly &#8211; yes the price at the pump would go up, but that would just reflect reality instead of being hidden in other taxes!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcio Ferraz</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-10804</link> <dc:creator>Marcio Ferraz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:10:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/#comment-10804</guid> <description>It&#039;s hard to believe that while the world is breaking apart, the big oil companies not only profit from the most needed commodity in this world but still receive tax breaks and subsidies!!?? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe that while the world is breaking apart, the big oil companies not only profit from the most needed commodity in this world but still receive tax breaks and subsidies!!??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: meryn</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-10803</link> <dc:creator>meryn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 13:17:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/#comment-10803</guid> <description>The article by the Center for American Progress cites &quot;a $1.3 billion annual tax loophole&quot;. How does this relate to &quot;the $18 billion in tax breaks&quot; you cite? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article by the Center for American Progress cites &#8220;a $1.3 billion annual tax loophole&#8221;. How does this relate to &#8220;the $18 billion in tax breaks&#8221; you cite?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: meryn</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-10802</link> <dc:creator>meryn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 13:05:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/05/u-s-oil-subsidies-need-to-go/#comment-10802</guid> <description>Thank you for this overview!
18 BB on 123 BB (is that after-tax or pre-tax profit?) is nearly 15%, that&#039;s no small matter. This really tilts the playing field in the wrong way.
I read some time ago about loan guarantees for coal plants. Is this true, and has this appeared on Triplepundit yet? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this overview!<br
/> 18 BB on 123 BB (is that after-tax or pre-tax profit?) is nearly 15%, that&#8217;s no small matter. This really tilts the playing field in the wrong way.<br
/> I read some time ago about loan guarantees for coal plants. Is this true, and has this appeared on Triplepundit yet?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 308/309 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-09 22:10:42 -->
