Comments on: Home Solar, Minus the Cost, Effort, Worry

By: Now’s The Time To Switch to Alternative Energy - Washington's Blog

Now’s The Time To Switch to Alternative Energy - Washington's Blog — Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:21:09 +0000

[...] With recent breakthroughs, individuals can now generate enough energy to get off the grid and power their own homes. Indeed, some companies will even provide the equipment for you (and see this). [...]

By: We Can Solve Our Energy Problems By Learning How the World Really Works | Dark Politricks

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:30:55 +0000

By: Prevent Fukushimas and Gulf Oil Spills By Conserving Energy

Prevent Fukushimas and Gulf Oil Spills By Conserving Energy — Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:15:45 +0000

By: Are We On the Verge of an Energy Breakthrough? | Japan Quake Report

Are We On the Verge of an Energy Breakthrough? | Japan Quake Report — Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:39:27 +0000

By: Are We On the Verge of an Energy Breakthrough? | Dark Politricks

Are We On the Verge of an Energy Breakthrough? | Dark Politricks — Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:30:43 +0000

By: SunRun: A New Kind of Utility Company

SunRun: A New Kind of Utility Company — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:04:00 +0000

[...] homeowners are interested in utilizing renewable energy sources, including solar panels, but the costs are often prohibitive. Even with tax incentives, solar panels and wind turbines cannot always provide an acceptable [...]

By: Now’s The Time To Switch to Alternative Energy

Now’s The Time To Switch to Alternative Energy — Sun, 23 May 2010 20:08:37 +0000

By: Paul Smith

Paul Smith — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:10:54 +0000

@Elizabeth you may want to check in with a company that does a lot of solar out in more remote places, Plan It Solar. They may have some ideas for you. http://www.planitsolar.com/

By: Elizabeth De Roos

Elizabeth De Roos — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:07:19 +0000

What about those of us out in the boonies off the grid? If my research is correct we get no rebates & of course can’t sell back to a utility.

By: Bob

Bob — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:44:20 +0000

From what I understand about how these companies make their money, *I believe* they would be able to harness any utility rebates and state/federal rebates.

Simple example here in AZ – if it costs $9/watt to install solar they get $3/watt right off the bat from the utils. Then they get 30% of the remainder as a federal tax credit or about $2/watt meaning they are only out $4/watt for the install. Now remember you need to put a few grand up front plus the stream of payments over the service agreement.

Even if they don’t get the federal credit they probably get the util’s money and your upfront payment. And they retain ownership – which with panels that have 20-25 year warranties they can expect to earn $ beyond the initial contract period.

By: Paul Smith

Paul Smith — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:13:31 +0000

Wow Caitlin, you really did your homework, thanks for sharing this information. As I told the COO when I interviewed them, I’m definitely looking into them when I buy a home next year.

By: Caitlin MIskimen

Caitlin MIskimen — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:21:12 +0000

Regarding a comparison between SolarCity and SunRun, here’s what I’ve gleaned from reading about them online:
* SolarCity is an installer, and in the way of financing it provides homeowners with something called the SolarLease. Basically an equipment lease, homeowners pay a low upfront cost and then a set monthly bill for the duration of their contract. Seems a bit fuzzy when you get into details about insurance, monitoring and maintenance, and you don’t get much choice about who you work with.
* SunRun is a service, so it works with a variety of installers to get panels on your roof (my favorite so far is Akeena, who has some really cool looking panels). Big differentiators with SolarCity: The amount of SunRun’s payments are based on the electricity you use; SunRun insures panels and guarantees performance; and SunRun takes care of the maintenance.

By: Wei-En Tan

Wei-En Tan — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:31:15 +0000

Hi Thor,

The sun is certainly free, but harnessing its power certainly isn’t, and considering that utility prices are predicted to rise on an average of 9.8% in 2009 ,

http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2008/07/25/US_electric_rates_predicted_to_rise/UPI-39351217004823/

looks like a fixed rate for 18 years is a very good idea, and would be even better if it were longer…

By: thor

thor — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:35:50 +0000

Why get into a contract for 18 years. Sounds like a ploy form the energy moguls of today to hold on to their monopoly by hooking you up for 18 years now, for things that are free (solar energy) and in the very near future will only be a small upfront cost.