<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Offsets: A Regular Part of a Diet Light in Carbon?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/offsets-a-regular-part-of-a-diet-light-in-carbon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/offsets-a-regular-part-of-a-diet-light-in-carbon/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mario Vellandi</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/offsets-a-regular-part-of-a-diet-light-in-carbon/comment-page-1/#comment-11136</link> <dc:creator>Mario Vellandi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:43:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/07/offsets-a-regular-part-of-a-diet-light-in-carbon/#comment-11136</guid> <description>The smoke in the air is still quite hazy, and honestly I believe that in areas where compliance is not an issue, it&#039;s better to just donate money to reputable environmental organizations involved in the industry of the company, or which are relevant to the community where a firm&#039;s operations are based. Return on social investment and reputable/desirable affiliation should be the parameters in a cost-benefit analysis. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smoke in the air is still quite hazy, and honestly I believe that in areas where compliance is not an issue, it&#8217;s better to just donate money to reputable environmental organizations involved in the industry of the company, or which are relevant to the community where a firm&#8217;s operations are based. Return on social investment and reputable/desirable affiliation should be the parameters in a cost-benefit analysis.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HAJ1</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/offsets-a-regular-part-of-a-diet-light-in-carbon/comment-page-1/#comment-11135</link> <dc:creator>HAJ1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:14:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/07/offsets-a-regular-part-of-a-diet-light-in-carbon/#comment-11135</guid> <description>Great topic! Thank you for shedding some light on the possible role of offsets in regulatory GHG emmissions reduction schemes like AB32.
It will be interesting to see what CARB will do to ensure synergy with WCI&#039;s GHG reduction scheme??? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great topic! Thank you for shedding some light on the possible role of offsets in regulatory GHG emmissions reduction schemes like AB32.<br
/> It will be interesting to see what CARB will do to ensure synergy with WCI&#8217;s GHG reduction scheme???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 240/241 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-09 23:59:50 -->
