<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: San Francisco to Vote on Clean Energy City Charter on November Ballot:  Why is &#8220;Green&#8221; Mayor Gavin Newsom Opposed?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/san-francisco-to-vote-on-clean-energy-city-charter-on-november-ballot-why-is-green-mayor-gavin-newsom-opposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/san-francisco-to-vote-on-clean-energy-city-charter-on-november-ballot-why-is-green-mayor-gavin-newsom-opposed/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Thomas Schueneman</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/san-francisco-to-vote-on-clean-energy-city-charter-on-november-ballot-why-is-green-mayor-gavin-newsom-opposed/comment-page-1/#comment-11206</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Schueneman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:19:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/07/san-francisco-to-vote-on-clean-energy-city-charter-on-november-ballot-why-is-green-mayor-gavin-newsom-opposed/#comment-11206</guid> <description>Dave: Yeah, I&#039;m pretty hard on the mayor, I admit that. I&#039;ve had the opportunity to see him behaving badly... Anyway,  I see no reason why there can&#039;t at least be a feasibility study, which is required before any action takes place. I just don&#039;t see the sense in all this talk about &quot;taking over PG&amp;E&quot;. Thanks for the comment!
Anonymous: Well, I never said that PG&amp;E isn&#039;t accountable.
It&#039;s a legitimate question to ask how this plan will be paid for, but to go from that instantly to the characterization that &quot;I&quot; am going to soak the rich or &quot;drive the little guy further into the ground&quot; is pretty weak, don&#039;t you think? Is there any middle ground at all?
Nor am I &quot;advocating&quot; pain  -  but if you think the &quot;little guy&quot; isn&#039;t already experiencing pain (has this been an easy 8 years for you?) or that there won&#039;t be some pain as we make the changes in the coming years in how we do business, you&#039;re only fooling yourself. If you want it to be &quot;easy&quot; then you liking offer no solution at all. So grab your wallet and run! (or come up with another clich√©...) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave: Yeah, I&#8217;m pretty hard on the mayor, I admit that. I&#8217;ve had the opportunity to see him behaving badly&#8230; Anyway,  I see no reason why there can&#8217;t at least be a feasibility study, which is required before any action takes place. I just don&#8217;t see the sense in all this talk about &#8220;taking over PG&#038;E&#8221;. Thanks for the comment!<br
/> Anonymous: Well, I never said that PG&#038;E isn&#8217;t accountable.<br
/> It&#8217;s a legitimate question to ask how this plan will be paid for, but to go from that instantly to the characterization that &#8220;I&#8221; am going to soak the rich or &#8220;drive the little guy further into the ground&#8221; is pretty weak, don&#8217;t you think? Is there any middle ground at all?<br
/> Nor am I &#8220;advocating&#8221; pain  &#8211;  but if you think the &#8220;little guy&#8221; isn&#8217;t already experiencing pain (has this been an easy 8 years for you?) or that there won&#8217;t be some pain as we make the changes in the coming years in how we do business, you&#8217;re only fooling yourself. If you want it to be &#8220;easy&#8221; then you liking offer no solution at all. So grab your wallet and run! (or come up with another clich√©&#8230;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/san-francisco-to-vote-on-clean-energy-city-charter-on-november-ballot-why-is-green-mayor-gavin-newsom-opposed/comment-page-1/#comment-11205</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:32:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/07/san-francisco-to-vote-on-clean-energy-city-charter-on-november-ballot-why-is-green-mayor-gavin-newsom-opposed/#comment-11205</guid> <description>You know, PG&amp;E is a /publicly regulated/ monopoly.  It isn&#039;t unaccountable.
Not one word about how much this is going to cost.  Green is not free.  It&#039;s not cheap.  In fact, it&#039;s expensive.  What&#039;s your plan to pay for it?  Soak the rich?  Or drive the little guy further into the ground?
&quot;Being Progressive Sometimes Hurts.&quot;  When you hear somebody advocating pain, grab your wallet and run. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, PG&#038;E is a /publicly regulated/ monopoly.  It isn&#8217;t unaccountable.<br
/> Not one word about how much this is going to cost.  Green is not free.  It&#8217;s not cheap.  In fact, it&#8217;s expensive.  What&#8217;s your plan to pay for it?  Soak the rich?  Or drive the little guy further into the ground?<br
/> &#8220;Being Progressive Sometimes Hurts.&#8221;  When you hear somebody advocating pain, grab your wallet and run.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Shires</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/07/san-francisco-to-vote-on-clean-energy-city-charter-on-november-ballot-why-is-green-mayor-gavin-newsom-opposed/comment-page-1/#comment-11204</link> <dc:creator>Dave Shires</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:18:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/07/san-francisco-to-vote-on-clean-energy-city-charter-on-november-ballot-why-is-green-mayor-gavin-newsom-opposed/#comment-11204</guid> <description>Tough words.. well written, but I hesitate to condemn the Mayor outright, he&#039;s got to walk a fine line between interests and power structures.  Also, though everyone loves to hate PG&amp;E around here (SF), they&#039;re arguably doing more than any other major utility in the country when it comes to renewables and other innovations, I mean they really are.
Still, I don&#039;t like a semi-functional monopoly holding suit either! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough words.. well written, but I hesitate to condemn the Mayor outright, he&#8217;s got to walk a fine line between interests and power structures.  Also, though everyone loves to hate PG&#038;E around here (SF), they&#8217;re arguably doing more than any other major utility in the country when it comes to renewables and other innovations, I mean they really are.<br
/> Still, I don&#8217;t like a semi-functional monopoly holding suit either!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 257/258 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 03:54:24 -->
