<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shale Gas: Energy Boon or Environmental Bane, Part One</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: A Gold Mine of Pending Disaster &#124;</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-76769</link> <dc:creator>A Gold Mine of Pending Disaster &#124;</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 02:15:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/#comment-76769</guid> <description>[...] 2008, Andrew Burger from Triple Pundit reported that 4.5 million gallons of water is used in order to pump out the gas in each constructed [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008, Andrew Burger from Triple Pundit reported that 4.5 million gallons of water is used in order to pump out the gas in each constructed [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A Gold Mine of Pending Disaster &#124; The Canadian Political Scene</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-76441</link> <dc:creator>A Gold Mine of Pending Disaster &#124; The Canadian Political Scene</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:13:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/#comment-76441</guid> <description>[...] 2008, Andrew Burger from Triple Pundit reported that 4.5 million gallons of water is used in order to pump out the gas in each constructed [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008, Andrew Burger from Triple Pundit reported that 4.5 million gallons of water is used in order to pump out the gas in each constructed [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William Henry Frauenhoff</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-53941</link> <dc:creator>William Henry Frauenhoff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:17:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/#comment-53941</guid> <description>I serve as an RN and as a man who has a bad gut feeling about the direction this planet is heading. I am not vindictive or violent but by the grace and mercy of God I am very protective of the things I can protect.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I serve as an RN and as a man who has a bad gut feeling about the direction this planet is heading. I am not vindictive or violent but by the grace and mercy of God I am very protective of the things I can protect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shale gas and Turkmenistan &#171; Nahili Samurai</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-37388</link> <dc:creator>Shale gas and Turkmenistan &#171; Nahili Samurai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:41:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/#comment-37388</guid> <description>[...] the environmental point of view, there are concerns about water contamination, which coincides with global insufficient supply of [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the environmental point of view, there are concerns about water contamination, which coincides with global insufficient supply of [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LifeIsAGas</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-15429</link> <dc:creator>LifeIsAGas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:22:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/#comment-15429</guid> <description>Do you have any references to back up your assertion that producing shale gas does not adversely impact the water supply?Marvin wrote:
&quot;The contribution of shale gas exploration and development to this phenomenon? It is not even practically measurable.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any references to back up your assertion that producing shale gas does not adversely impact the water supply?</p><p>Marvin wrote:<br
/> &#8220;The contribution of shale gas exploration and development to this phenomenon? It is not even practically measurable.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marvin</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-11255</link> <dc:creator>Marvin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/#comment-11255</guid> <description>Shale gas wells, exploration and development, despite the protestations of the &quot;crisis, crisis&quot; crowd have had no (none, zero, nada) impact upon the depletion of the major source of water on the plains which is aquifer water.  As far back as the 1950&#039;s it was already recognized that agricultural and urban exploitation of the aquifer was already having a depletive effect.  The excessive use of water from this source is currently drawing down levels at a rate of 2-3 feet per year.  The contribution of shale gas exploration and development to this phenomenon?  It is not even practically measurable. Environment first people looking for another corporate bogeyman to hound ought to get their facts straight and make sure to take their pills religiously. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shale gas wells, exploration and development, despite the protestations of the &#8220;crisis, crisis&#8221; crowd have had no (none, zero, nada) impact upon the depletion of the major source of water on the plains which is aquifer water.  As far back as the 1950&#8242;s it was already recognized that agricultural and urban exploitation of the aquifer was already having a depletive effect.  The excessive use of water from this source is currently drawing down levels at a rate of 2-3 feet per year.  The contribution of shale gas exploration and development to this phenomenon?  It is not even practically measurable. Environment first people looking for another corporate bogeyman to hound ought to get their facts straight and make sure to take their pills religiously.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-11254</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:27:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/08/shale-gas-energy-boon-or-environmental-bane-part-one/#comment-11254</guid> <description>Sacrificing water for energy  -  natural gas  -  the last straw.
We have a luxury to choose among different sources of energy. But we only have one water. Clean and accessible water should be the stick against which to measure appropriate sources of energy. Everywhere natural gas goes, people are up in arms to protect water from it. In Sacred Headwaters region of north west British Columbia, New York, Nevada, New Mexico, Arctic Chukchi Sea, and in Ontario&#039;s Northern York Region, west of Toronto and in central Toronto, proposed natural gas operations sit on major watersheds and waterways.
In addition to climate chaos, loss of local water supplies is a major issue raised in the fight against natural gas.
http://floodiceorfire.wordpress.com/gas-water-2/ </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacrificing water for energy  &#8211;  natural gas  &#8211;  the last straw.<br
/> We have a luxury to choose among different sources of energy. But we only have one water. Clean and accessible water should be the stick against which to measure appropriate sources of energy. Everywhere natural gas goes, people are up in arms to protect water from it. In Sacred Headwaters region of north west British Columbia, New York, Nevada, New Mexico, Arctic Chukchi Sea, and in Ontario&#8217;s Northern York Region, west of Toronto and in central Toronto, proposed natural gas operations sit on major watersheds and waterways.<br
/> In addition to climate chaos, loss of local water supplies is a major issue raised in the fight against natural gas.<br
/> <a
href="http://floodiceorfire.wordpress.com/gas-water-2/" rel="nofollow">http://floodiceorfire.wordpress.com/gas-water-2/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 325/328 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 01:36:34 -->
