Comments on: Chicago Company Launches Tree Free Paper

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:57:35 +0000

I meant our most pressing issue is “not” which paper to use

By: chris

chris — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:54:09 +0000

I'm not convinced either way. I saw this paper in Walgreens yesterday and thought it was really cool. It looks and feels good and I thought is sounded authentic. But I also question the sustainability of LimeStone and other processes required to produce it anyway. I could be cynical and say F-It, the world is beyond repair anyway, especially when one considers the population is doing nothing but exploding. But that's not a good attitude to have because it will only hasten the process of the Earth's destruction. So I do what I can to make help the world hang in there a few more years. Does that make any difference, absolutely not. The conglomerates and the greed of the Capitalistic economic system is killing our mother Gaia. They're only in it for profit, in fact that's the only way they'll be successful in this system. People are not going to buy stock in a company if it isn't going to produce profits. That's just the way it is. On that note, our most pressing issue is which paper to use; it is to bring the Corporations under strict regulations. However, with the Supreme Courts recent ruling, which opened the flood gates for corporations to pour money into certain campaigns and elections, I think we're doomed. Either way, I am still going to do more research before I buy any of the supposedly awesome paper. (Well, I might just buy one note book because it's super cool!)

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:57:35 +0000

I meant our most pressing issue is “not” which paper to use

By: chris

chris — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:54:09 +0000

By: Ilene Klinghoffer

Ilene Klinghoffer — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:44:02 +0000

I am the printing production manager at a large company, and I think this paper is bogus. It CANNOT be recycled. When we asked about that, we were told that it will decompose in landfills just like regular paper. In other words, not very quickly if it’s not on the surface. We asked about the amount of energy required to break down the stone component into dust, and we received a nonanswer that didn’t address the question. We used this stock for a while before we did the research on it, but we will not be using it again

By: Carlos

Carlos — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:08:40 +0000

Where can this paper be purchased for commercial Printing?

By: jessica

jessica — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:45:08 +0000

FiberStone paper is FSC certified by the way.
However, pardon my ignorance, but does limestone grow or is it manufacturable? I ask this because regardless if it’s the 5th largest resource on earth (as stated earlier), if all of us jump on the limestone-train this plentiful resource will eventually deplete. This is not a progressive tree-free, nor sustainable resource in the least if it just endangers a different resource! Can anyone clarify this for me?
Thanks!

By: jeff salisbury

jeff salisbury — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:12:49 +0000

Interesting paid advertisement. Interesting posts. Stone papers are not new- this stuff has been around for over 7 years. Calcium carbonate has been used in paper for hundreds of years. What IS new is the use of this material in labels and packaging. I don’t know about this ultra green film but I do know about FiberStone‚Ñ¢ tree-free paper made from stone. For answers about stone paper/rock papers such as FiberStone‚Ñ¢ you can go to http://www.naturalsourceprinting.com/fiberstone or google FiberStone tree-free paper. The answers you all seek are there, and if they are not just e-mail me: (Jeff Salisbury) jeff@labelimpressions.com. I’ll be happy to give you the skinny on stone paper.

By: angelique van engelen

angelique van engelen — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:22:51 +0000

HH, still laughing about that last line. Really Greg, do let me know if you need help with your marketing. I’d love to sophisticate things up for you!!

By: angelique van engelen

angelique van engelen — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:53:54 +0000

Thank you Greg, that clarifies a lot. Mind you, I did not ‘copy and paste’ anything besides the quotes. Once more; I am convinced this is a winner and I think it deserves some sort of award.

By: Greg Kestler

Greg Kestler — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:25:04 +0000

I was flattered that Angelique copied and pasted our Ultra Green Tree Free Paper sale sheet on this website and commented on its appeal as a green alternative to paper or synthetic paper. I’m not at all surprised with the responses it received. When it comes to environmental issues, and especially items that use this sensitive topic to promote themselves, there are plenty of critics ready to raise their hand and cry foul.
The environmental impact of Ultra Green has everything to do with the manufacturing process, not the recycling of it. At no time did GPA indicate that we are presenting to our customers a product that will revolutionize the recycling or disposal of printed matter as we know it. There is no silver bullet in this area. Printers nor their suppliers can be held responsible for the recycling of the printed materials that are produced, paper or plastic. Items that end up in landfills do exactly that- fill our land with stuff. Ultra Green is comprised of 20% HDPE (high density polyethylene)that can be recycled. The recycling of Ultra Green has the same challenges as recycling efforts of paper or synthetic papers that it may replace on a given print campaign. In my opinion, recycling efforts as a whole fall way too short. The truth of the matter is Ultra Green when used as a substitute for paper has a positive influence on the environment, as Angelique stated in her article. It saves trees, water, and energy as compared to the manufacturing of paper. Synthetic papers such as Tyvek, Yupo, and other polypropylene or polyethylene based products, are solely derived from petrochemicals which makes Ultra Green an ecological choice. Oh and by the way the paper manufactures in the U.S. have been replanting trees for over 75 years. Forest land has increased 10% since 1920, despite a 143% increase in population, so don’t bash the paper companies for not doing their part, they just use water and harsh chemicals to make their products and produce water-born waste in the process.
Ultra Green is not a miracle product that will make all other substrate alternatives obsolete, it’s just an alternative substrate that offers a greener process to produce. As far as it being 80% calcium carbonate (limestone) and how were depleting another natural resource hmmmm… The earths crust is comprised of 15% limestone and limestone is the 5th most abundant element on earth.
I would caution everyone to be on the alert in these times as marketing “Going Green” seems to be the in thing to do. It’s all in how you spin it, after all it’s not so new, how do you think the explores got anyone to want to travel northwest from Iceland it was easy they simply called the new place Greenland.

By: Mark in Edmonton

Mark in Edmonton — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:47:05 +0000

Very good points – don’t forget to add end of life disposal – this plastic product get driven out of town, processed and then sit’s in a landfill (carbon sequestration?) whereas paper goes in my composter and feeds my flowers.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:09:51 +0000

Another important point to consider is this:
If this new “paper” enters the recycling cycle (via recycling bins for example), how is it going to affect the recycling process if you try to mix it with regular fiber-based paper?

By: Ellen

Ellen — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:53:44 +0000

Be careful! HDPE is a type of plastic. Where does plastic come from? Petroleum. Hmmmm? Don’t we have a supply and demand problem with that stuff?