« Back to Home Page

Taking a Bite out of Cement’s Global Warming Potential

| Tuesday September 9th, 2008 | 5 Comments

concrete.jpg Hardcore greenhouse gas (GHG) geeks will recall that cement is a huge source of greenhouse gas emissions, with approximately 1 ton of CO2 equivalent emitted into the atmosphere for every 1 ton of cement produced. Damn. Forget your carbon guilt from flying, people! Cement is responsible for 5% of the Earth’s CO2 emissions, and it’s the third largest source of greenhouse gas pollution in the US according to the EPA.
A new technique has the potential to change cement’s impact on global warming, and I wouldn’t be writing about them if there wasn’t a great business opportunity here as well. Calera has created a process for incorporating waste CO2 emissions from a power plant into the cement manufacturing process. His system sequesters a half a ton of CO2 for every ton of cement created.

Constantz used biomimicry, the process of looking to nature for design inspiration, to get his idea. Sea coral create marine cement as one component of the reef building process, and the coral combine calcium, magnesium, and seawater to make their tough-as-nails product. Constantz has figured out a way to mimic the same process using the spent CO2 as a material source. “We are turning CO2 into carbonic acid and then making carbonate,” Constantz says. “All we need is [sea] water and pollution.”


The Calera process will prevent CO2 from entering the atmosphere in two ways: it eliminates the need to heat limestone (the key ingredient in traditional cement), which is one of the main sources of emissions in the traditional stuff, and it sequesters CO2 in the cement. Scientific American
explains the process in greater depth:

Nor are there any limitations on the raw materials of the Calera cement: Seawater containing billions of tons of calcium and magnesium covers 70 percent of the planet and the 2,775 power plants in the U.S. alone pumped out 2.5 billion metric tons of CO2 in 2006. The process results in seawater that is stripped of calcium and magnesium – ideal for desalinization technologies – but safe to be dumped back into the ocean.

In addition to using otherwise unusable materials and sequestering all that CO2, Constantz estimates that his cement will be cheaper to produce than the mainstream stuff (retailing at $100 a ton instead of $110.) That’s before you start talking about the potential for selling carbon offsets based on the carbon sequestration. Before you start calling Constantz to ask if he needs seed funding, you should know that venture capitalist Vinod Khosla has beaten you to the punch, as he usually does.
Via: SF Gate


▼▼▼      5 Comments     ▼▼▼

Categorized: Uncategorized|

Newsletter Signup
  • Jim Ryan

    This is the first I’ve read that may be worth something.

  • Jim Ryan

    This is the first I’ve read that may be worth something.

  • Boudewijn Piscaer

    Making cement with a smaller carbon footprint is one good thing.
    Making lower volume higher quality cement concrete is another very good thing turning concrete finally into a higher tech product.
    In the refractory industry we have been making low cement concrete since the 80th. Why cant we do it with civil concrete?
    1. Because regulations are wrong. They have to be Performance instead of Prescription oriented.
    2. Because the cement industry is not capable to make the switch from volume to quality, despite the fact that they also have the know how to help their customers with 3-5% cement concrete. As long as they consider concrete packaging of cement, they keep the customers ignorent. And thats ignorent since then only price and not cost plays a role
    I am happy to report that we seem to get lower cement concrete finally on the road in Europe with the UNIVERDE/SUSTCON network.
    By the way, what is cement? For the same concrete we can have at least 5 different water binder ratios! Thus we are still working with pseudo technology unless we go performance base. Dont ask the steel industry to design a good car, neither the aluminum industry a good plane!

  • Boudewijn Piscaer

    Making cement with a smaller carbon footprint is one good thing.
    Making lower volume higher quality cement concrete is another very good thing turning concrete finally into a higher tech product.
    In the refractory industry we have been making low cement concrete since the 80th. Why cant we do it with civil concrete?
    1. Because regulations are wrong. They have to be Performance instead of Prescription oriented.
    2. Because the cement industry is not capable to make the switch from volume to quality, despite the fact that they also have the know how to help their customers with 3-5% cement concrete. As long as they consider concrete packaging of cement, they keep the customers ignorent. And thats ignorent since then only price and not cost plays a role
    I am happy to report that we seem to get lower cement concrete finally on the road in Europe with the UNIVERDE/SUSTCON network.
    By the way, what is cement? For the same concrete we can have at least 5 different water binder ratios! Thus we are still working with pseudo technology unless we go performance base. Dont ask the steel industry to design a good car, neither the aluminum industry a good plane!

    • http://www.CementScience.com/ TAN Zhijun

      Great, we can make cement more green for the world.