<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just What is Sustainability? &#8211; Shell Delves Into a Thorny Issue, Part One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/11/just-what-is-sustainability%e2%80%9aaishell-delves-into-a-thorny-issue-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/11/just-what-is-sustainability%e2%80%9aaishell-delves-into-a-thorny-issue-part-one/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:18:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2008/11/just-what-is-sustainability%e2%80%9aaishell-delves-into-a-thorny-issue-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-9982</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2008/11/just-what-is-sustainability%e2%80%9aaishell-delves-into-a-thorny-issue-part-one/#comment-9982</guid>
		<description>What did they say?
Shell is a business. It&#039;s not a government or nonprofit. It survives by being competitive. One competitive advantage is externalization of costs. One in particular is pollution (CO2 or whatever). They CANNOT take a direction where they internalize costs that their competitors are still externalizing. They will lose and fail. Government must require ALL for profit organizations to internalize costs (like CO2) equally, on a level playing field. Corporations are not thinking entities. They are more like a dog that smells bacon when it comes to profits. They will do whatever we (the government) require of them but no more. It&#039;s up to us to get them out of government and put in place a sustainable (by our definition not theirs)framework (playing field) for them to operate in.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did they say?<br />
Shell is a business. It&#8217;s not a government or nonprofit. It survives by being competitive. One competitive advantage is externalization of costs. One in particular is pollution (CO2 or whatever). They CANNOT take a direction where they internalize costs that their competitors are still externalizing. They will lose and fail. Government must require ALL for profit organizations to internalize costs (like CO2) equally, on a level playing field. Corporations are not thinking entities. They are more like a dog that smells bacon when it comes to profits. They will do whatever we (the government) require of them but no more. It&#8217;s up to us to get them out of government and put in place a sustainable (by our definition not theirs)framework (playing field) for them to operate in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
