« Back to Home Page

STAR Community Index: LEED Guidelines for Entire Cities

| Thursday November 27th, 2008 | 4 Comments

STARCommunityIndex.jpg Much as LEED™ has transformed the building industry, the people behind the STAR Community Index hope to transform the way local governments set priorities and implement policies and practices to make their cities more sustainable.
The STAR Community Index isn’t the first to try and rank or rate the greenness of cities. SustainLane for example has already put out three rankings on the sustainability of cities, including creating a network for government officials to exchange best practices.
However, as SustainLane’s methodology has sometimes been criticized, The STAR Community Index is taking a slightly different approach. GreenBiz writes, “The Star Community Index is the only thus far that intends to use the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design as a working model for development.”


According to its website, The STAR Community Index is a national, consensus-based framework for gauging the sustainability and livability of U.S. communities. STAR will be launched by 2010, and is currently being developed through a partnership between ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI), the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), and the Center for American Progress (CAP).
Program Director Lynne Barker said, during a briefing at the USGBC’s Greenbuild conference, “We want to create a common agenda through a national process.”
As Jetson Green writes, some of the aims of STAR are to offer a globally recognized green standard system for local governments, increase accountability in data and actions, create a roadmap to track and achieve environmental goals, enable peer-to-peer learning among communities, and engage public support and participation.
Taking a page out of the LEED rubric, STAR is soliciting community, volunteer participation to establish the framework of indicators and metrics by which cities will be rated. The volunteer based technical committees will focus on:
* Natural Systems (ecosystems, habitat, water, storm water, air quality, and resource conservation)
* Planning & Design (land use, transportation and mobility, and parks, open space and recreation)
* Energy & Climate (energy, emissions, renewable energy, and green building)
* Economic Development (clean technologies, green jobs, local commerce, tourism, and local food)
* Employment and Workforce Training (green job training, workforce wages, and youth skills)
* Education, Arts, and Community (education excellence, arts, civic engagement, and social equity)
* Children, Health, and Safety (community health, access to health care, and public safety)
* Affordability and Human Dignity (affordable, workforce housing, poverty, and human services).
The people behind STAR say it will become the definitive means by which local governments measure and “certify” their achievements.

Readers: What do you think are the most important elements, listed above or what was left out, to help make a city more sustainable?


▼▼▼      4 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup

Comments

  1. November 27, 2008 at 9:17 am PDT | Justin writes:

    I think the point is that none are more important than the other as they are part of a indivisible whole and to optimize one is to compromise the whole system.

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  2. November 27, 2008 at 14:49 pm PDT | Zaoop Ter writes:

    A major overisght is the need for inter-community coordination. One of the reasons many cities are in trouble (less so than in the past) is that the wealth education and taxbase has moved to the suburbs which have been able to “ghetto-ize” themselves away from the troubles of the cities, and often screwing the cities in the process. I”m not sure how to address that given this kind of standard, but there’s got to be some kind of mention!

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  3. March 09, 2009 at 11:35 am PDT | recording studios leeds writes:

    planning is very must of our work

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  4. September 30, 2009 at 3:29 am PDT | Recording Studios Leeds writes:

    Things that were looked at as being “not as important” cannot be under shot at present. Standards are changing rapidly and hopefully these regulations will impose the urgency which is very much needed.

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

Leave a Reply

  1. Please leave an intelligent comment. You are welcomed to link to your company or website, but entirely self promotional posts will be marked as spam.
There are 3 ways to comment on 3P

2. Facebook Users

Login to your Facebook account

3. Members

Register for an account or login.

Subscribe to Comments

  1. No trackbacks yet