http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/ Business, Better. Since 2005 Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:49:35 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-10267 james greyson Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:44:16 +0000 http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/#comment-10267 I'll believe that Tesco is serious about energy use when our local store shifts its big open freezer unit away from its big open hot food unit. Placing these two right next to each other is a climate change disaster. Ignoring repeated suggestions to separate them is a disaster for trust in Tesco. I’ll believe that Tesco is serious about energy use when our local store shifts its big open freezer unit away from its big open hot food unit. Placing these two right next to each other is a climate change disaster. Ignoring repeated suggestions to separate them is a disaster for trust in Tesco.

]]> http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-10266 Chocolato Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:55:02 +0000 http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/#comment-10266 Good news all around - however, in your title you say "70% lower" then in the post, you say "less than 70% of..." There's a big difference there, which is it? Good news all around – however, in your title you say “70% lower” then in the post, you say “less than 70% of…” There’s a big difference there, which is it?

]]>