<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tesco Builds New Superstore At 70% Lower Carbon Footprint Than Regular Stores</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: james greyson</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-10267</link> <dc:creator>james greyson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:44:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/#comment-10267</guid> <description>I&#039;ll believe that Tesco is serious about energy use when our local store shifts its big open freezer unit away from its big open hot food unit. Placing these two right next to each other is a climate change disaster. Ignoring repeated suggestions to separate them is a disaster for trust in Tesco. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll believe that Tesco is serious about energy use when our local store shifts its big open freezer unit away from its big open hot food unit. Placing these two right next to each other is a climate change disaster. Ignoring repeated suggestions to separate them is a disaster for trust in Tesco.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chocolato</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-10266</link> <dc:creator>Chocolato</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/01/tesco-builds-new-superstore-at-70-lower-carbon-footprint-than-regular-stores/#comment-10266</guid> <description>Good news all around - however, in your title you say &quot;70% lower&quot; then in the post, you say &quot;less than 70% of...&quot;  There&#039;s a big difference there, which is it? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news all around &#8211; however, in your title you say &#8220;70% lower&#8221; then in the post, you say &#8220;less than 70% of&#8230;&#8221;  There&#8217;s a big difference there, which is it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 240/241 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 02:45:05 -->
