<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspapers On-Demand: Greener, Interactive Solution for Tough Times?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/02/newspapers-on-demand-greener-interactive-solution-for-tough-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/02/newspapers-on-demand-greener-interactive-solution-for-tough-times/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:26:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick ASter</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/02/newspapers-on-demand-greener-interactive-solution-for-tough-times/comment-page-1/#comment-10308</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick ASter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/02/newspapers-on-demand-greener-interactive-solution-for-tough-times/#comment-10308</guid>
		<description>Nice analysis.  I have two thoughts about this:
1)You&#039;re quite right about the waste and other energy that goes into producing the various devices that are needed to read media electronically.  I&#039;ve seen various attempts at calculating it and it&#039;s pretty complicated, but I find it hard to believe that from a purely &quot;emissions&quot; or &quot;energy&quot; oriented calculation, the electronic media is really that much &quot;greener&quot;.
2) One thing that wasn&#039;t brought up is that the real benefit of electronic media is the extraordinary way that it enhances conversation - this is nothing short of a revolution, and if waste and energy are equal or not any worse, then this reason alone should make us happy we&#039;ve got this new media taking over. The fact that I&#039;m able to add to this conversation right now by typing this comment is a truly revolutionary thing.  The fact that other media can link here with positive or negative things to say is truly revolutionary - it enhances democracy, transparency, honesty and hopefully sharing and learning - and with out it, we can forget about helping humanity or the environment.  This is what I get excited about!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis.  I have two thoughts about this:<br />
1)You&#8217;re quite right about the waste and other energy that goes into producing the various devices that are needed to read media electronically.  I&#8217;ve seen various attempts at calculating it and it&#8217;s pretty complicated, but I find it hard to believe that from a purely &#8220;emissions&#8221; or &#8220;energy&#8221; oriented calculation, the electronic media is really that much &#8220;greener&#8221;.<br />
2) One thing that wasn&#8217;t brought up is that the real benefit of electronic media is the extraordinary way that it enhances conversation &#8211; this is nothing short of a revolution, and if waste and energy are equal or not any worse, then this reason alone should make us happy we&#8217;ve got this new media taking over. The fact that I&#8217;m able to add to this conversation right now by typing this comment is a truly revolutionary thing.  The fact that other media can link here with positive or negative things to say is truly revolutionary &#8211; it enhances democracy, transparency, honesty and hopefully sharing and learning &#8211; and with out it, we can forget about helping humanity or the environment.  This is what I get excited about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
