<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Newspapers On-Demand: Greener, Interactive Solution for Tough Times?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/02/newspapers-on-demand-greener-interactive-solution-for-tough-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/02/newspapers-on-demand-greener-interactive-solution-for-tough-times/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Nick ASter</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/02/newspapers-on-demand-greener-interactive-solution-for-tough-times/comment-page-1/#comment-10308</link> <dc:creator>Nick ASter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/02/newspapers-on-demand-greener-interactive-solution-for-tough-times/#comment-10308</guid> <description>Nice analysis.  I have two thoughts about this:
1)You&#039;re quite right about the waste and other energy that goes into producing the various devices that are needed to read media electronically.  I&#039;ve seen various attempts at calculating it and it&#039;s pretty complicated, but I find it hard to believe that from a purely &quot;emissions&quot; or &quot;energy&quot; oriented calculation, the electronic media is really that much &quot;greener&quot;.
2) One thing that wasn&#039;t brought up is that the real benefit of electronic media is the extraordinary way that it enhances conversation - this is nothing short of a revolution, and if waste and energy are equal or not any worse, then this reason alone should make us happy we&#039;ve got this new media taking over. The fact that I&#039;m able to add to this conversation right now by typing this comment is a truly revolutionary thing.  The fact that other media can link here with positive or negative things to say is truly revolutionary - it enhances democracy, transparency, honesty and hopefully sharing and learning - and with out it, we can forget about helping humanity or the environment.  This is what I get excited about! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis.  I have two thoughts about this:<br
/> 1)You&#8217;re quite right about the waste and other energy that goes into producing the various devices that are needed to read media electronically.  I&#8217;ve seen various attempts at calculating it and it&#8217;s pretty complicated, but I find it hard to believe that from a purely &#8220;emissions&#8221; or &#8220;energy&#8221; oriented calculation, the electronic media is really that much &#8220;greener&#8221;.<br
/> 2) One thing that wasn&#8217;t brought up is that the real benefit of electronic media is the extraordinary way that it enhances conversation &#8211; this is nothing short of a revolution, and if waste and energy are equal or not any worse, then this reason alone should make us happy we&#8217;ve got this new media taking over. The fact that I&#8217;m able to add to this conversation right now by typing this comment is a truly revolutionary thing.  The fact that other media can link here with positive or negative things to say is truly revolutionary &#8211; it enhances democracy, transparency, honesty and hopefully sharing and learning &#8211; and with out it, we can forget about helping humanity or the environment.  This is what I get excited about!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 223/224 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 02:35:31 -->
