<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Green Is My Product?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:05:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Firth</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/comment-page-1/#comment-9570</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Firth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/#comment-9570</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Peter, sorry it took so long to post... the world of EPDs and education is crazy right now.  Very good article and would love to see the dialogue continue on EPDs and spreading the word. Great job by the way!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The question of why is it different brings one major answer to mind: &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;LCA.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;  Most certifications programs out there use attributes that are selected based on values or some documentation that there is an identified issue within a given product category. They can be singular in focus or cover so much that it becomes confusing. Some are &quot;lowest common denominator&quot; in approach and others are the so high that only the best of the best can achieve them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where the EPD is different is that, at its core, it doesn&#039;t utilize someone&#039;s or a group&#039;s values or process to determine which criteria form the standard. The EPD is based on a Life Cycle Assessment, which takes into account the full range of impacts from cradle-to-grave/cradle. This eliminates the &quot;did I miss an impact or attribute&quot; type of question. The impacts are there. It also includes &quot;additional environmental aspects&quot; as are identified within the PCR in order to address issues such as Toxicity or Human Health that may not be covered by the LCA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bottom line, if your looking to move out of an age where there are hidden agendas and a complete lack of information, EPDs are going to help. The one caution I would note here is that an EPD doesn&#039;t itself designate a product as &quot;good&quot;. It provides the information for the user to make that determination based off of the situation, preferences or values of the purchasing organization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the interests of full disclosure, The Green Standard is the program operator of the only US EPD program. We are also working on a collaborative effort with a formal Type I ecolabel to combine it with our Type III to provide the best of both worlds... :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;stay tuned...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter, sorry it took so long to post&#8230; the world of EPDs and education is crazy right now.  Very good article and would love to see the dialogue continue on EPDs and spreading the word. Great job by the way!</p>
<p>The question of why is it different brings one major answer to mind: <i><b>LCA.</b></i>  Most certifications programs out there use attributes that are selected based on values or some documentation that there is an identified issue within a given product category. They can be singular in focus or cover so much that it becomes confusing. Some are &#8220;lowest common denominator&#8221; in approach and others are the so high that only the best of the best can achieve them.</p>
<p>Where the EPD is different is that, at its core, it doesn&#8217;t utilize someone&#8217;s or a group&#8217;s values or process to determine which criteria form the standard. The EPD is based on a Life Cycle Assessment, which takes into account the full range of impacts from cradle-to-grave/cradle. This eliminates the &#8220;did I miss an impact or attribute&#8221; type of question. The impacts are there. It also includes &#8220;additional environmental aspects&#8221; as are identified within the PCR in order to address issues such as Toxicity or Human Health that may not be covered by the LCA.</p>
<p>Bottom line, if your looking to move out of an age where there are hidden agendas and a complete lack of information, EPDs are going to help. The one caution I would note here is that an EPD doesn&#8217;t itself designate a product as &#8220;good&#8221;. It provides the information for the user to make that determination based off of the situation, preferences or values of the purchasing organization.</p>
<p>In the interests of full disclosure, The Green Standard is the program operator of the only US EPD program. We are also working on a collaborative effort with a formal Type I ecolabel to combine it with our Type III to provide the best of both worlds&#8230; :)</p>
<p>stay tuned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Gadonniex</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/comment-page-1/#comment-9569</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Gadonniex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/#comment-9569</guid>
		<description>Great article! I am also a major advocate of LCA to EPD and am in the process of producing a few for clients. It truly is a definitive way to compare environmental attributes of two products. However, it is important to note that an EPD is not a &quot;certification&quot;. The produced LCA information is verified by a 3rd party (a firm or person that does not conduct the LCA) then after the EPD is designed it is registered with another organization (again, separate from the verifying organization). In a sea of confusing single attribute eco labels and certifications, the verified, registered EPD is truly a way to understand a products ENTIRE impact.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! I am also a major advocate of LCA to EPD and am in the process of producing a few for clients. It truly is a definitive way to compare environmental attributes of two products. However, it is important to note that an EPD is not a &#8220;certification&#8221;. The produced LCA information is verified by a 3rd party (a firm or person that does not conduct the LCA) then after the EPD is designed it is registered with another organization (again, separate from the verifying organization). In a sea of confusing single attribute eco labels and certifications, the verified, registered EPD is truly a way to understand a products ENTIRE impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/comment-page-1/#comment-9568</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/#comment-9568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that greenwashing can be subjective and that makes it really tough on companies who can feel like they are in a lose-lose situation. There needs to be a clear path for them that avoids both patches of thorns and certification can be that path. Although you also have to look at why the certifications out there have not already achieved this and the answer is, as you stated, that a clear standard is needed rather than a confusing mess of certifications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is the EPD certification the answer we&#039;ve been looking for? The basis of the certification looks promising, but I&#039;d love to see more details, such as if a company (or product) is judged only compared to others in its class or to its potential. (I.e. what has more value, an industry leader in sustainability that in fact isn&#039;t doing all that much or a mid-range one that is actually doing more?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the question becomes: what makes EPD&#039;s different than the countless other certifications out there? I&#039;m not even talking about the details of the certification here, but assuming it is has a better methodology, what is it doing differently to come to the fore and become the standard, something that every certification body was and is intending to do?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m looking forward to hearing more about this, keep us posted!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that greenwashing can be subjective and that makes it really tough on companies who can feel like they are in a lose-lose situation. There needs to be a clear path for them that avoids both patches of thorns and certification can be that path. Although you also have to look at why the certifications out there have not already achieved this and the answer is, as you stated, that a clear standard is needed rather than a confusing mess of certifications.</p>
<p>Is the EPD certification the answer we&#8217;ve been looking for? The basis of the certification looks promising, but I&#8217;d love to see more details, such as if a company (or product) is judged only compared to others in its class or to its potential. (I.e. what has more value, an industry leader in sustainability that in fact isn&#8217;t doing all that much or a mid-range one that is actually doing more?)</p>
<p>So the question becomes: what makes EPD&#8217;s different than the countless other certifications out there? I&#8217;m not even talking about the details of the certification here, but assuming it is has a better methodology, what is it doing differently to come to the fore and become the standard, something that every certification body was and is intending to do?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to hearing more about this, keep us posted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/comment-page-1/#comment-9567</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/06/how-green-is-my-product/#comment-9567</guid>
		<description>I was actively involved in the Fair Trade coffee industry for a few years. MOST coffee roasters saw the benefit of a &#039;beyond reproach&#039; certifying body, but a handful of personality driven businesses felt that they could do &#039;fair&#039; better and that they could position themselves as beyond reproach. There were/are mixed results.
The difference with environmental issues today is that there are so many watchdogs, self appointed and otherwise, who dissect every visible part of your business.  Standards like the EPD will inevitably be the cost of doing business.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actively involved in the Fair Trade coffee industry for a few years. MOST coffee roasters saw the benefit of a &#8216;beyond reproach&#8217; certifying body, but a handful of personality driven businesses felt that they could do &#8216;fair&#8217; better and that they could position themselves as beyond reproach. There were/are mixed results.<br />
The difference with environmental issues today is that there are so many watchdogs, self appointed and otherwise, who dissect every visible part of your business.  Standards like the EPD will inevitably be the cost of doing business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
