<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why Yahoo Won&#8217;t Buy Carbon Offsets Anymore</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/07/why-yahoo-won%e2%80%9aaot-buy-carbon-offsets-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/07/why-yahoo-won%e2%80%9aaot-buy-carbon-offsets-anymore/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Harris</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/07/why-yahoo-won%e2%80%9aaot-buy-carbon-offsets-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-9704</link> <dc:creator>David Harris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:34:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/wordpress/2009/07/why-yahoo-won%e2%80%9aaot-buy-carbon-offsets-anymore/#comment-9704</guid> <description>To be clear, Yahoo went from zero net emissions (having offset 100% of its somewhat inefficient energy use), to offsetting none of its now or soon more efficient energy use.  An accurate headline for its press release could have been &quot;Yahoo announces plans to increase CO2 emissions.&quot;
Certainly energy efficiency is a must.  But so is everthing else we can do to reduce emissions overall, including offsetting with projects that owe their existence to the carbon market. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, Yahoo went from zero net emissions (having offset 100% of its somewhat inefficient energy use), to offsetting none of its now or soon more efficient energy use.  An accurate headline for its press release could have been &#8220;Yahoo announces plans to increase CO2 emissions.&#8221;<br
/> Certainly energy efficiency is a must.  But so is everthing else we can do to reduce emissions overall, including offsetting with projects that owe their existence to the carbon market.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 223/224 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 01:33:19 -->
