<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Can Junk Mail Ever Be Considered Sustainable? Possibly</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/can-junk-mail-ever-be-considered-sustainable-possibly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/can-junk-mail-ever-be-considered-sustainable-possibly/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chris Milton</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/can-junk-mail-ever-be-considered-sustainable-possibly/comment-page-1/#comment-16037</link> <dc:creator>Chris Milton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:54:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11620#comment-16037</guid> <description>I had a thought the other day, that snail mail would eventually just become a form of advertising with all P2P comms transferring onto social media.Dukky is your new postal service: you can even block people like you can on twitter.Neat! (I hope!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a thought the other day, that snail mail would eventually just become a form of advertising with all P2P comms transferring onto social media.</p><p>Dukky is your new postal service: you can even block people like you can on twitter.</p><p>Neat! (I hope!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mailing List Opt-In and Opt-Out &#124; DUKKY - Our target is 100% redemption.</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/can-junk-mail-ever-be-considered-sustainable-possibly/comment-page-1/#comment-16013</link> <dc:creator>Mailing List Opt-In and Opt-Out &#124; DUKKY - Our target is 100% redemption.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:58:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11620#comment-16013</guid> <description>[...] Today, Triple Pundit did a piece on Dukky and Unjunk Mail and dug into the question of why a direct marketing company would sponsor a Do Not Mail service. Check it out here. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today, Triple Pundit did a piece on Dukky and Unjunk Mail and dug into the question of why a direct marketing company would sponsor a Do Not Mail service. Check it out here. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul S</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/can-junk-mail-ever-be-considered-sustainable-possibly/comment-page-1/#comment-16009</link> <dc:creator>Paul S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:18:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11620#comment-16009</guid> <description>@Kristen: Thanks for the clarification. Great to hear, and I&#039;d be interested to hear how it improves over time as you refine your lists.@Ashwin: Agreed, it puts some fun in something that is otherwise an ever present low level annoyance.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kristen: Thanks for the clarification. Great to hear, and I&#8217;d be interested to hear how it improves over time as you refine your lists.</p><p>@Ashwin: Agreed, it puts some fun in something that is otherwise an ever present low level annoyance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashwin Seshagiri</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/can-junk-mail-ever-be-considered-sustainable-possibly/comment-page-1/#comment-16002</link> <dc:creator>Ashwin Seshagiri</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11620#comment-16002</guid> <description>Those return to sender cards are great. Really cool way to turn direct mail on its head.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those return to sender cards are great. Really cool way to turn direct mail on its head.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kristen</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/can-junk-mail-ever-be-considered-sustainable-possibly/comment-page-1/#comment-16000</link> <dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:11:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11620#comment-16000</guid> <description>Thanks for talking about the Unjunk Mail and Dukky story.I hope some healthy conversation about junk mail and the direct mail industry follows.One point of clarification - right now, Dukky is guaranteeing an 8% response rate to clients. Response rates to the physical mailers should actually be much higher. Our goal? &quot;100% redemption.&quot;Kristen</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for talking about the Unjunk Mail and Dukky story.</p><p>I hope some healthy conversation about junk mail and the direct mail industry follows.</p><p>One point of clarification &#8211; right now, Dukky is guaranteeing an 8% response rate to clients. Response rates to the physical mailers should actually be much higher. Our goal? &#8220;100% redemption.&#8221;</p><p>Kristen</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 291/292 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 01:43:01 -->
