<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: E-waste Offsets: A Good Idea but How Effective?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/e-waste-offsets-a-good-idea-but-how-effective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/e-waste-offsets-a-good-idea-but-how-effective/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jim Witkin</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/e-waste-offsets-a-good-idea-but-how-effective/comment-page-1/#comment-15624</link> <dc:creator>Jim Witkin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:39:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=10556#comment-15624</guid> <description>Rita, you make a good point, although your church &quot;indulgences&quot; parallel never occurred to me. I tend to agree with you. I think the Ewaste Foundation is well intentioned, but their system may do little to change behavior. I favor fixing the problem much further upstream.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rita, you make a good point, although your church &#8220;indulgences&#8221; parallel never occurred to me. I tend to agree with you. I think the Ewaste Foundation is well intentioned, but their system may do little to change behavior. I favor fixing the problem much further upstream.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rita</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/e-waste-offsets-a-good-idea-but-how-effective/comment-page-1/#comment-15592</link> <dc:creator>Rita</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:29:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=10556#comment-15592</guid> <description>The &quot;offset&quot; idea seems to be good, but the concept is the same one as was embodied in the &quot;indulgences&quot; of the Catholic church, where you could pay the priests to pray you into heaven. This concept and its mis-use was a major source of the Protestant Revolution, and you know where that got us (the 30 years war, the 100 years war). Carbon offsets are explicitly forbidden in the various carbon footprinting standards and also in the developing French environmental product declaration guidance, for a good reason. If you want to donate money to support appropriate waste management, great. But don&#039;t imagine that that somehow forgives you of the responsibility to manage your own ewaste properly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;offset&#8221; idea seems to be good, but the concept is the same one as was embodied in the &#8220;indulgences&#8221; of the Catholic church, where you could pay the priests to pray you into heaven. This concept and its mis-use was a major source of the Protestant Revolution, and you know where that got us (the 30 years war, the 100 years war). Carbon offsets are explicitly forbidden in the various carbon footprinting standards and also in the developing French environmental product declaration guidance, for a good reason. If you want to donate money to support appropriate waste management, great. But don&#8217;t imagine that that somehow forgives you of the responsibility to manage your own ewaste properly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 240/241 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 00:55:46 -->
