http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/natural-gas-bridge-fuel-or-renewable-energy-killer/ Business, Better. Since 2005 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/natural-gas-bridge-fuel-or-renewable-energy-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-40824 Portable Generators for Sale Thu, 20 May 2010 15:12:14 +0000 http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11402#comment-40824 There are some pros and cons on natural gas but for me natural gas serves as a bridge fuel and not a energy killer. There are some pros and cons on natural gas but for me natural gas serves as a bridge fuel and not a energy killer.

]]> http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/natural-gas-bridge-fuel-or-renewable-energy-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-33018 Portable Generators for Sale Thu, 20 May 2010 08:12:14 +0000 http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11402#comment-33018 There are some pros and cons on natural gas but for me natural gas serves as a bridge fuel and not a energy killer. There are some pros and cons on natural gas but for me natural gas serves as a bridge fuel and not a energy killer.

]]> http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/natural-gas-bridge-fuel-or-renewable-energy-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-16346 Green Energy Reader » Weekly Reader: Sept.03.2009 Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:06:42 +0000 http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11402#comment-16346 [...] Natural gas that replaces renewable power projects hurts the environment, but natural gas that replaces coal bridges the gap [...] [...] Natural gas that replaces renewable power projects hurts the environment, but natural gas that replaces coal bridges the gap [...]

]]> http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/natural-gas-bridge-fuel-or-renewable-energy-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-16041 kevin Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:10:59 +0000 http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11402#comment-16041 Seems almost ridiculous to be having this debate. This one be in my opinion something as a last resort arguement of oil industry proponents to foster as reasoning to stymie the urgent move away from oil.In a nut shell what is being said is lets continue to add to twice the amount of polluants to the air lets continue to allow our country to be held hostage by middle eastern interests until a new cheaper method of energy is devised or advanced.At the very least it is assuring to see the only arguement aganist our best chance of cutting our addiction to oil is fear of dependence on a form of energy found right here at home with a life expendency of 100 years. Maybe in fifty years as time appears to be running out the fear of gas running low will foster the same urgency to move from oil most feel today. Seems almost ridiculous to be having this debate. This one be in my opinion something as a last resort arguement of oil industry proponents to foster as reasoning to stymie the urgent move away from oil.In a nut shell what is being said is lets continue to add to twice the amount of polluants to the air lets continue to allow our country to be held hostage by middle eastern interests until a new cheaper method of energy is devised or advanced.At the very least it is assuring to see the only arguement aganist our best chance of cutting our addiction to oil is fear of dependence on a form of energy found right here at home with a life expendency of 100 years. Maybe in fifty years as time appears to be running out the fear of gas running low will foster the same urgency to move from oil most feel today.

]]>