<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Business Case for Coal</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/the-business-case-for-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/the-business-case-for-coal/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Nick Aster</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/the-business-case-for-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-16198</link> <dc:creator>Nick Aster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11669#comment-16198</guid> <description>Actually, these are the only comments.  Do you have something &quot;ungreen&quot; to say?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, these are the only comments.  Do you have something &#8220;ungreen&#8221; to say?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DR Wilson</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/the-business-case-for-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-16190</link> <dc:creator>DR Wilson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:18:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11669#comment-16190</guid> <description>It is strange how only the green comments get posted!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is strange how only the green comments get posted!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gil Friend</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/the-business-case-for-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-16146</link> <dc:creator>Gil Friend</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11669#comment-16146</guid> <description>More on why coal is a bad business decision (and why I say &quot;no more coal&quot;):
http://blogs.natlogic.com/friend/2007/09/no_more_coal.html
&amp;
http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007286.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on why coal is a bad business decision (and why I say &#8220;no more coal&#8221;):<br
/> <a
href="http://blogs.natlogic.com/friend/2007/09/no_more_coal.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.natlogic.com/friend/2007/09/no_more_coal.html</a><br
/> &amp;<br
/> <a
href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007286.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007286.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wk</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/08/the-business-case-for-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-16131</link> <dc:creator>wk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:48:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=11669#comment-16131</guid> <description>Not for long. In 2015 renewable solar energy will be cheaper than coal.  3 million each from DOE to five solar companies for 1 1/2 year project to do R&amp;D on efficiency. However  will remain between 15%-20%. The only way to cut cost and improve efficiency is nano solar cells rolled printed on any surface with 80% efficienct, the same technology  used with nano-anttenas from Idaho   laboratery that didn&#039;t receive any funding.  Funding went to solar power plants R&amp;D, to generate electricity they can sell and make profit</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not for long. In 2015 renewable solar energy will be cheaper than coal.  3 million each from DOE to five solar companies for 1 1/2 year project to do R&amp;D on efficiency. However  will remain between 15%-20%. The only way to cut cost and improve efficiency is nano solar cells rolled printed on any surface with 80% efficienct, the same technology  used with nano-anttenas from Idaho   laboratery that didn&#8217;t receive any funding.  Funding went to solar power plants R&amp;D, to generate electricity they can sell and make profit</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 274/277 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-09 21:22:11 -->
