Surprise! Sigg Bottles Did Contain BPA After All.by Audrey Khuner on Wednesday, Sep 2nd, 2009 ShareClick to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)More articles on the controversy surrounding bottled water can be found here!A bottle full of BPA-laden tears. That’s what I’ve cried for you, Sigg. You have let me down. To think, you were my proud symbol of healthy environmentalism. You represented anti-plastic bottled water as I filled and refilled you every day at the tap. Now I am filled and refilled with shame for you and your company’s non-transparent ways.I’m not so mad that your lining did in fact contain the reproductive health problem-causing BPA (the main reason consumers like me made an effort to avoid plastic in the first place), it’s that you lied. Perhaps the BPA in your lining does not leach into the liquid contained by your bottles, but your web of lies has leached into the consumer’s conscious. Good luck talking your way out of this one. Here’s some background: in early 2007, it became publicly known that BPA, found in a variety of items such as plastic baby bottles and sports bottles, can seep from containers into the liquid we drink, causing reproductive disorders. This caused health conscious consumers to switch from their Nalgenes and other plastic bottles to metal bottles, such as Sigg. Expensive and stylish, it remained unclear whether or not these bottles contained BPA. So many consumer-watch groups and green sites, such as TreeHugger, asked Sigg straight out. CEO, Steve Wasik. responded with carefully worded emails, explaining Sigg’s supplier has an agreement to keep the formula confidential. However, he assured us that “Very thorough migration testing in laboratories around the world is conducted regularly and has consistently shown SIGG aluminum bottles to have no presence of lead, phthalates, Bysphenol A (BPA), Bysphenol B (BPB) or any other chemicals which scientists have deemed as potentially harmful.”And yet, in a recent press release, the very same man, CEO Steve Wasik, explains that Sigg bottles bottles manufactured prior to August 2008 have a water-based epoxy liner which contains trace amounts of BPA. He continues to explain that NOW all Sigg bottles are BPA free. Oh, NOW they are. After I’ve been drinking out of my Sigg day after day, month after month, believing it to be BPA-free.Granted, tests have shown that the BPA from Sigg bottles does not leach into the water in the bottle. But that’s not really the point. The point is that there is a strong expectation today for companies to be transparent, especially companies that are considered on the more sustainable end of the spectrum. When a trusted company goes through such lengths to hide the truth, it makes consumers like me question why we should ever rely on their products again.As an extremely detailed article from Z Recommends puts it Sigg has been: “carefully controlling information about its products, challenging consumer advocacy organizations when they made statements that were unproven but that the company knew to be true, and “coming clean” only when it suited its own purposes.” This leaches a dark spot of shame on a company I once considered to be trustworthy and sustainable. I hope other companies can learn from this mistake and, moving forward, consider transparency to be the most important company value. Audrey is a freelance copywriter. She has worked with every kind of company, helping them to communicate their message of sustainability. Careful to never greenwash, Audrey believes that transparency in marketing is just as important as branding. And that doing well and doing good are not mutually exclusive. When she's not blogging, marketing sustainability or writing radio commercials for Chinese food, you can find Audrey rock-climbing, riding her bike around San Francisco, or looking for work (she's available for hire, call now!) Follow Audrey Khuner @triplepundit 15 responses The liner may not be BPA-free, but your water is. I understand resentment over the misleading marketing by SIGG, but to get upset about the potential of BPA in the liquid of your SIGG is much ado about nothing considering several tests show that it does not leech unlike other plastics. Use Kleen Kanteens.They were sounding the alarm on BPA prior to it seeping in to mass consciousness in 2007. It’s not about the presence of BPA in the lining. It’s about a supposedly sustainable company being so intentionally misleading (and not just through marketing, through news media as well). Sets a bad example and leaves a bad taste in my mouth. A taste I cannot rinse out because all my water bottles are Sigg. So are you throwing away all your SIGG bottles or still using them? Throw them my way if you are. If not your STILL not getting ANY BPA in your system by using them. I have my old BPA SIGG bottle right here and I don’t get ANY bad taste in my mouth drinking from it or reading all the hoop-la about who said what when. SIGG bottles are still the best bottles made and SIGG is still making a big impact on saving our environment and I hope they continue to do so. First of all, you can’t taste BPA. Second you are the same guy I replied to on the Mother Nature page. Are you working for them as I suspect you are? The tests are flawed in the company contracted testing that was done. There is BPA leaching from these linings so quit lying to people. The test were done at parts per billion and this is not the standard for testing this chemical. BPA is more harmful to the Endocrine system at very very low doses and their testing states that, “no detectable levels above LOQ.” Which means they did not detect levels above 2 parts per billion. This however does not state that they did not find BPA, it only states that they did not test for it lower than 2 ppb. You can have your BPA lined SIGG bottles if you are only interested in saving the environment. Environment won’t matter that much to people if they are all to sick or diseased to enjoy. Stop using these bottles now, for your health or your children’s health(especially). A class action lawsuit has been filed:http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/09/02/Class_Claims_Toxin_Was_in_Aluminum_Bottles.htm God, this sucks. I really love my Sigg bottles.There is a local SF company called EarthLust, that makes pretty nice all-aluminum bottles with no liner at all. They’re designed in SF and “ethically made in China”. Wish they were manufactured here but anyway it’s a good company and a good bottle. Pingback: CamelBak vs. Sigg – Great Tactical PR Move « BBPR – Action Sports Marketing, Targeted Lifestyle Communications and Anything Else We Feel Like Making Snarky Comments About If you own a SIGG Bottle you can call me and I will sell you an URBAN CANTEEN Bottle at a very competitive price and we can Recycle the SIGG bottle. My website is http://www.urbancanteen.com- 100% BPA free. We only sell the highest quality bottle made today.THanks Jeff 410-905-5051 I feel completely appalled by all of this, what about the stainless steel bottles? I have always made the choice when purchasing to buy them. Has there been any information on whether or not they have used an unnecessary coating on them?????????? Pingback: Hot Water: How SIGG Lost My Trust (And Kind of Broke My Heart) : Sustainablog Here is Wasik’s attempt to get out of the doghouse: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-wasik/sigg-ceo-im-sorry_b_278291.html Pingback: Top Five Greenwash Posts of the Year | Triple Pundit: People, Planet, Profit I have been a long timer buyer and lover of Sigg products and I have purchased more than $100 worth of their water bottles/canteens in my life.I will never buy another Sigg product, nor support them by word of mouth for the rest of my life.Kudos to Sporting Good Stores like REI who have refused to carry Sigg anymore because of their dishonesty. Pingback: SIGG Aluminum Bottles Contain BPA After All; SIGG CEO Almost Contrite, Almost - AMP Agency Comments are closed.