<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Does Nuclear Energy Have the Power to Save the Climate Bill?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/does-nuclear-energy-have-the-power-to-save-the-climate-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/does-nuclear-energy-have-the-power-to-save-the-climate-bill/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/does-nuclear-energy-have-the-power-to-save-the-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-18771</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:28:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=15540#comment-18771</guid> <description>Nuclear power is a clean source of energy that is sustainable much longer than oil is.  The waste problem is a bit of an issue, but the spent fuel rods are actually less radioactive than they were when they went into the reactor after 500 years.In order to enjoy long-term economic growth, we need lots of energy- not just efficiency.  Nuclear is an inexpensive way to provide that energy.Finally, most people who live near existing nuclear reactors favor the construction of new plants in their neighborhood by a 3:1 margin; we can increase nuclear generating capacity without putting reactors where they&#039;re not wanted.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuclear power is a clean source of energy that is sustainable much longer than oil is.  The waste problem is a bit of an issue, but the spent fuel rods are actually less radioactive than they were when they went into the reactor after 500 years.</p><p>In order to enjoy long-term economic growth, we need lots of energy- not just efficiency.  Nuclear is an inexpensive way to provide that energy.</p><p>Finally, most people who live near existing nuclear reactors favor the construction of new plants in their neighborhood by a 3:1 margin; we can increase nuclear generating capacity without putting reactors where they&#8217;re not wanted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nuclear ETFs: The Power Source Is Gaining Favor &#124; ETF Trends</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/does-nuclear-energy-have-the-power-to-save-the-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-18475</link> <dc:creator>Nuclear ETFs: The Power Source Is Gaining Favor &#124; ETF Trends</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:01:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=15540#comment-18475</guid> <description>[...] The main drawback for nuclear power is that the development process is slow. The benefits are that in addition to being safe, it&#8217;s also a relatively cheap power source, says Sarah Harper for Triple Pundit. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The main drawback for nuclear power is that the development process is slow. The benefits are that in addition to being safe, it&#8217;s also a relatively cheap power source, says Sarah Harper for Triple Pundit. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shel Horowitz - Ethical Marketing Expert</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/does-nuclear-energy-have-the-power-to-save-the-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-18233</link> <dc:creator>Shel Horowitz - Ethical Marketing Expert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:45:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=15540#comment-18233</guid> <description>Nucelar will cause more problems than it solves. One of the other things Lovins says is that we could recapture 70-80 percent of the energy we now use, by designing for efficiency (see my article about him at http://www.frugalmarketing.com/dtb/amorylovins.shtml ) -- and this is a far better strategy than dealing with the waste, safety, terrorism vulnerability, transmission loss, and various other problems that nuclear brings.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nucelar will cause more problems than it solves. One of the other things Lovins says is that we could recapture 70-80 percent of the energy we now use, by designing for efficiency (see my article about him at <a
href="http://www.frugalmarketing.com/dtb/amorylovins.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.frugalmarketing.com/dtb/amorylovins.shtml</a> ) &#8212; and this is a far better strategy than dealing with the waste, safety, terrorism vulnerability, transmission loss, and various other problems that nuclear brings.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eolufemi</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/does-nuclear-energy-have-the-power-to-save-the-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-18220</link> <dc:creator>eolufemi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:00:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=15540#comment-18220</guid> <description>I think off-shore drilling and building new nuclear plants are absolutely necessary. We have to become less dependent on the middle east for energy, specifically oil.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think off-shore drilling and building new nuclear plants are absolutely necessary. We have to become less dependent on the middle east for energy, specifically oil.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 274/275 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 03:31:03 -->
