<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Exxon&#8217;s Tillerson Calls for Carbon Tax &#8211; Seriously?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/exxon-tillerson-carbon-tax-seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/exxon-tillerson-carbon-tax-seriously/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Rob Bryan</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/exxon-tillerson-carbon-tax-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-18023</link> <dc:creator>Rob Bryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:35:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=15260#comment-18023</guid> <description>Divide and conquer????  Would a carbon tax simplify accounting? Deflect the attention from the carbon producers to the government?What we know- Exxon will continue to externalize as much as it can. In any way it can. That&#039;s their job. No really. The system says their job is to externalize as many costs as possible and focus only on shareholder returns- at the expense of everything and everybody else. Too much focus on the players distracts from the culprit- the system.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divide and conquer????  Would a carbon tax simplify accounting? Deflect the attention from the carbon producers to the government?</p><p>What we know- Exxon will continue to externalize as much as it can. In any way it can. That&#8217;s their job. No really. The system says their job is to externalize as many costs as possible and focus only on shareholder returns- at the expense of everything and everybody else. Too much focus on the players distracts from the culprit- the system.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neal H. Levin</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/exxon-tillerson-carbon-tax-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-18001</link> <dc:creator>Neal H. Levin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:53:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=15260#comment-18001</guid> <description>&quot;...seems like a step in the right direction.&quot;Though I&#039;m fully supportive of any behemoth wishing to re-steer the ship by even small increments, I&#039;m having trouble believing at this (very) early stage that Tillerson has taken any step at all, let alone one in the &quot;right&quot; direction.  His comments are so chocked full of self-serving rhetoric that they belie the very transparency that he professes...and where was this rhetoric BEFORE cap-and-trade hit the Capitol floor?I&#039;m going to adopt a &quot;wait and see&quot; approach to this action before I&#039;m willing to consider whether it&#039;s a step in the right direction veruses another giant leap backwards, though I certainly hope it&#039;s the former and applaud any action to that end.  It&#039;s the land of opportunity for Tillerson to make even MORE money while being more responsible...let&#039;s see if he&#039;s got the courage to capitalize on it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;seems like a step in the right direction.&#8221;</p><p>Though I&#8217;m fully supportive of any behemoth wishing to re-steer the ship by even small increments, I&#8217;m having trouble believing at this (very) early stage that Tillerson has taken any step at all, let alone one in the &#8220;right&#8221; direction.  His comments are so chocked full of self-serving rhetoric that they belie the very transparency that he professes&#8230;and where was this rhetoric BEFORE cap-and-trade hit the Capitol floor?</p><p>I&#8217;m going to adopt a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; approach to this action before I&#8217;m willing to consider whether it&#8217;s a step in the right direction veruses another giant leap backwards, though I certainly hope it&#8217;s the former and applaud any action to that end.  It&#8217;s the land of opportunity for Tillerson to make even MORE money while being more responsible&#8230;let&#8217;s see if he&#8217;s got the courage to capitalize on it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 240/241 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-09 23:20:07 -->
