<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exxon&#8217;s Tillerson Calls for Carbon Tax &#8211; Seriously?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/exxon-tillerson-carbon-tax-seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/exxon-tillerson-carbon-tax-seriously/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:46:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/exxon-tillerson-carbon-tax-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-18023</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=15260#comment-18023</guid>
		<description>Divide and conquer????  Would a carbon tax simplify accounting? Deflect the attention from the carbon producers to the government? 

What we know- Exxon will continue to externalize as much as it can. In any way it can. That&#039;s their job. No really. The system says their job is to externalize as many costs as possible and focus only on shareholder returns- at the expense of everything and everybody else. Too much focus on the players distracts from the culprit- the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divide and conquer????  Would a carbon tax simplify accounting? Deflect the attention from the carbon producers to the government? </p>
<p>What we know- Exxon will continue to externalize as much as it can. In any way it can. That&#8217;s their job. No really. The system says their job is to externalize as many costs as possible and focus only on shareholder returns- at the expense of everything and everybody else. Too much focus on the players distracts from the culprit- the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal H. Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/exxon-tillerson-carbon-tax-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-18001</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal H. Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=15260#comment-18001</guid>
		<description>&quot;...seems like a step in the right direction.&quot;

Though I&#039;m fully supportive of any behemoth wishing to re-steer the ship by even small increments, I&#039;m having trouble believing at this (very) early stage that Tillerson has taken any step at all, let alone one in the &quot;right&quot; direction.  His comments are so chocked full of self-serving rhetoric that they belie the very transparency that he professes...and where was this rhetoric BEFORE cap-and-trade hit the Capitol floor?

I&#039;m going to adopt a &quot;wait and see&quot; approach to this action before I&#039;m willing to consider whether it&#039;s a step in the right direction veruses another giant leap backwards, though I certainly hope it&#039;s the former and applaud any action to that end.  It&#039;s the land of opportunity for Tillerson to make even MORE money while being more responsible...let&#039;s see if he&#039;s got the courage to capitalize on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;seems like a step in the right direction.&#8221;</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;m fully supportive of any behemoth wishing to re-steer the ship by even small increments, I&#8217;m having trouble believing at this (very) early stage that Tillerson has taken any step at all, let alone one in the &#8220;right&#8221; direction.  His comments are so chocked full of self-serving rhetoric that they belie the very transparency that he professes&#8230;and where was this rhetoric BEFORE cap-and-trade hit the Capitol floor?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to adopt a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; approach to this action before I&#8217;m willing to consider whether it&#8217;s a step in the right direction veruses another giant leap backwards, though I certainly hope it&#8217;s the former and applaud any action to that end.  It&#8217;s the land of opportunity for Tillerson to make even MORE money while being more responsible&#8230;let&#8217;s see if he&#8217;s got the courage to capitalize on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
