<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Solar Conference Opening Coincides with Obama Stroll Through the PV Panels</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/solar-conference-coincides-with-obamas-stroll-through-the-pv-panels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/solar-conference-coincides-with-obamas-stroll-through-the-pv-panels/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Solar Hot Water</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/solar-conference-coincides-with-obamas-stroll-through-the-pv-panels/comment-page-1/#comment-19478</link> <dc:creator>Solar Hot Water</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:38:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=17302#comment-19478</guid> <description>I am very pro solar, but you could massage those figues to show that fossil fuel is less costly (in terms of subsidies)70% and $72 billion for fossil and 0.5% and $1 billion for solar. That makes solar twice as costly. Still solar is in its infancy and needs that big push in terms of $$.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pro solar, but you could massage those figues to show that fossil fuel is less costly (in terms of subsidies)</p><p>70% and $72 billion for fossil and 0.5% and $1 billion for solar. That makes solar twice as costly. Still solar is in its infancy and needs that big push in terms of $$.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sean Campbell</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/solar-conference-coincides-with-obamas-stroll-through-the-pv-panels/comment-page-1/#comment-19425</link> <dc:creator>Sean Campbell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=17302#comment-19425</guid> <description>To argue that fossil fuels deserve more subsidies because more use them is completely void of logic.  In resource management, the use of non-renewable resources should be discouraged.  Increasing the use of solar will help to stabilize the cost of fossil fuels.  If the president is truly committed to alternative energy he will put his money where his mouth is. http://www.solarizon.net</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To argue that fossil fuels deserve more subsidies because more use them is completely void of logic.  In resource management, the use of non-renewable resources should be discouraged.  Increasing the use of solar will help to stabilize the cost of fossil fuels.  If the president is truly committed to alternative energy he will put his money where his mouth is. <a
href="http://www.solarizon.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.solarizon.net</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 239/240 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 03:02:52 -->
