<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America Recycles Day: A Look at Single-Stream Recycling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/</link>
	<description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:58:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Aster</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20501</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Aster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20501</guid>
		<description>Great response, Wes.  I love Lloyd because he shakes things up...  I think your perspective reflects the reality of how complex things are and the time it&#039;ll take to get us to a more sustainable point.  

Lloyd&#039;s post did get me thinking about the idea of &quot;design for reuse&quot; from the beginning, which I think is especially important with complex items like computers and cars.  By designing products from the begining to have second lives, or to have replaceable elements we&#039;ll be able to manage the whole stream much more efficiently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great response, Wes.  I love Lloyd because he shakes things up&#8230;  I think your perspective reflects the reality of how complex things are and the time it&#8217;ll take to get us to a more sustainable point.  </p>
<p>Lloyd&#8217;s post did get me thinking about the idea of &#8220;design for reuse&#8221; from the beginning, which I think is especially important with complex items like computers and cars.  By designing products from the begining to have second lives, or to have replaceable elements we&#8217;ll be able to manage the whole stream much more efficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20497</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20497</guid>
		<description>Single-stream recycling is not a panacea and is not always less expensive.  Capital costs are higher - automated trucks, carts, single-stream MRFs - and revenue from the sale of recylables is often much lower due to contamination.  Paper grades in single-stream programs are usually downgraded because of contamination from plastic, glass, moisture, etc.  As well, because most of the single-stream programs are automated cart-based systems, there is no simple way to tell a resident if he is putting the wrong materials in his cart.  Off they go to the MRF where they are removed and disposed of, not recycled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single-stream recycling is not a panacea and is not always less expensive.  Capital costs are higher &#8211; automated trucks, carts, single-stream MRFs &#8211; and revenue from the sale of recylables is often much lower due to contamination.  Paper grades in single-stream programs are usually downgraded because of contamination from plastic, glass, moisture, etc.  As well, because most of the single-stream programs are automated cart-based systems, there is no simple way to tell a resident if he is putting the wrong materials in his cart.  Off they go to the MRF where they are removed and disposed of, not recycled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20496</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20496</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick,

I think everyone agrees that we need to reduce the amount the waste we each generate.  However, I respectfully disagree with Lloyd’s point of view about recycling.  We live in a consumer-driven society that makes up our significant portion of our GDP, and in turn, there remains a demand for manufactured products. The resulting waste needs to be handled, and recycling has proven advantages that benefit the entire population. The EPA explains that recycling generates positive results, including: 

- Protecting and expand U.S. manufacturing jobs;
- Increasing U.S. competitiveness;
- Preventing pollution caused by the manufacturing of products from virgin materials, and 
- Saving energy, among other clear environmental benefits.  

Recycling requires a collective effort; corporations and consumers alike share the responsibility of taking steps to reduce the waste they produce and use. America Recycles Day serves as a reminder to us all of the need to share this responsibility to attain these benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p>
<p>I think everyone agrees that we need to reduce the amount the waste we each generate.  However, I respectfully disagree with Lloyd’s point of view about recycling.  We live in a consumer-driven society that makes up our significant portion of our GDP, and in turn, there remains a demand for manufactured products. The resulting waste needs to be handled, and recycling has proven advantages that benefit the entire population. The EPA explains that recycling generates positive results, including: </p>
<p>- Protecting and expand U.S. manufacturing jobs;<br />
- Increasing U.S. competitiveness;<br />
- Preventing pollution caused by the manufacturing of products from virgin materials, and<br />
- Saving energy, among other clear environmental benefits.  </p>
<p>Recycling requires a collective effort; corporations and consumers alike share the responsibility of taking steps to reduce the waste they produce and use. America Recycles Day serves as a reminder to us all of the need to share this responsibility to attain these benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John at Cell Phone Recycling</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20492</link>
		<dc:creator>John at Cell Phone Recycling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20492</guid>
		<description>I am happy that American&#039;s are doing a great job. I hope there will also be a world&#039;s recycle day. The bigger the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy that American&#8217;s are doing a great job. I hope there will also be a world&#8217;s recycle day. The bigger the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Aster</title>
		<link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20467</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Aster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20467</guid>
		<description>Hey Wes, what do you think about Lloyd Alter&#039;s take on Recycling day?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/recycling-is-bullshit-nov-15.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LINK HERE&lt;/a&gt;.  Basically he&#039;s calling out recycling as BS, and an imposition on taxpayers by unscrupulous companies (like bottled water manufacturers) who would rather we clean up after them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Wes, what do you think about Lloyd Alter&#8217;s take on Recycling day?  <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/recycling-is-bullshit-nov-15.php" rel="nofollow">LINK HERE</a>.  Basically he&#8217;s calling out recycling as BS, and an imposition on taxpayers by unscrupulous companies (like bottled water manufacturers) who would rather we clean up after them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
