<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: America Recycles Day: A Look at Single-Stream Recycling</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Nick Aster</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20501</link> <dc:creator>Nick Aster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:17:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20501</guid> <description>Great response, Wes.  I love Lloyd because he shakes things up...  I think your perspective reflects the reality of how complex things are and the time it&#039;ll take to get us to a more sustainable point.Lloyd&#039;s post did get me thinking about the idea of &quot;design for reuse&quot; from the beginning, which I think is especially important with complex items like computers and cars.  By designing products from the begining to have second lives, or to have replaceable elements we&#039;ll be able to manage the whole stream much more efficiently.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great response, Wes.  I love Lloyd because he shakes things up&#8230;  I think your perspective reflects the reality of how complex things are and the time it&#8217;ll take to get us to a more sustainable point.</p><p>Lloyd&#8217;s post did get me thinking about the idea of &#8220;design for reuse&#8221; from the beginning, which I think is especially important with complex items like computers and cars.  By designing products from the begining to have second lives, or to have replaceable elements we&#8217;ll be able to manage the whole stream much more efficiently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Allen Lynch</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20497</link> <dc:creator>Allen Lynch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20497</guid> <description>Single-stream recycling is not a panacea and is not always less expensive.  Capital costs are higher - automated trucks, carts, single-stream MRFs - and revenue from the sale of recylables is often much lower due to contamination.  Paper grades in single-stream programs are usually downgraded because of contamination from plastic, glass, moisture, etc.  As well, because most of the single-stream programs are automated cart-based systems, there is no simple way to tell a resident if he is putting the wrong materials in his cart.  Off they go to the MRF where they are removed and disposed of, not recycled.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single-stream recycling is not a panacea and is not always less expensive.  Capital costs are higher &#8211; automated trucks, carts, single-stream MRFs &#8211; and revenue from the sale of recylables is often much lower due to contamination.  Paper grades in single-stream programs are usually downgraded because of contamination from plastic, glass, moisture, etc.  As well, because most of the single-stream programs are automated cart-based systems, there is no simple way to tell a resident if he is putting the wrong materials in his cart.  Off they go to the MRF where they are removed and disposed of, not recycled.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wes Muir</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20496</link> <dc:creator>Wes Muir</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:58:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20496</guid> <description>Hi Nick,I think everyone agrees that we need to reduce the amount the waste we each generate.  However, I respectfully disagree with Lloyd’s point of view about recycling.  We live in a consumer-driven society that makes up our significant portion of our GDP, and in turn, there remains a demand for manufactured products. The resulting waste needs to be handled, and recycling has proven advantages that benefit the entire population. The EPA explains that recycling generates positive results, including:- Protecting and expand U.S. manufacturing jobs;
- Increasing U.S. competitiveness;
- Preventing pollution caused by the manufacturing of products from virgin materials, and
- Saving energy, among other clear environmental benefits.Recycling requires a collective effort; corporations and consumers alike share the responsibility of taking steps to reduce the waste they produce and use. America Recycles Day serves as a reminder to us all of the need to share this responsibility to attain these benefits.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p><p>I think everyone agrees that we need to reduce the amount the waste we each generate.  However, I respectfully disagree with Lloyd’s point of view about recycling.  We live in a consumer-driven society that makes up our significant portion of our GDP, and in turn, there remains a demand for manufactured products. The resulting waste needs to be handled, and recycling has proven advantages that benefit the entire population. The EPA explains that recycling generates positive results, including:</p><p>- Protecting and expand U.S. manufacturing jobs;<br
/> - Increasing U.S. competitiveness;<br
/> - Preventing pollution caused by the manufacturing of products from virgin materials, and<br
/> - Saving energy, among other clear environmental benefits.</p><p>Recycling requires a collective effort; corporations and consumers alike share the responsibility of taking steps to reduce the waste they produce and use. America Recycles Day serves as a reminder to us all of the need to share this responsibility to attain these benefits.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John at Cell Phone Recycling</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20492</link> <dc:creator>John at Cell Phone Recycling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20492</guid> <description>I am happy that American&#039;s are doing a great job. I hope there will also be a world&#039;s recycle day. The bigger the better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy that American&#8217;s are doing a great job. I hope there will also be a world&#8217;s recycle day. The bigger the better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick Aster</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/america-recycles-day-a-look-at-single-stream-recycling/comment-page-1/#comment-20467</link> <dc:creator>Nick Aster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18894#comment-20467</guid> <description>Hey Wes, what do you think about Lloyd Alter&#039;s take on Recycling day?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/recycling-is-bullshit-nov-15.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LINK HERE&lt;/a&gt;.  Basically he&#039;s calling out recycling as BS, and an imposition on taxpayers by unscrupulous companies (like bottled water manufacturers) who would rather we clean up after them...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Wes, what do you think about Lloyd Alter&#8217;s take on Recycling day? <a
href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/recycling-is-bullshit-nov-15.php" rel="nofollow">LINK HERE</a>.  Basically he&#8217;s calling out recycling as BS, and an imposition on taxpayers by unscrupulous companies (like bottled water manufacturers) who would rather we clean up after them&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 292/297 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 01:53:11 -->
