ForestEthics versus SFI. The green industry is overwhelmed by trustmarks and certification organizatons. As a result, consumers don’t know whom to believe anymore. As it turns out SFI (Sustainable Forestry Initiative) is funded and managed primarily by large logging companies, whereas ForestEthics is an environmental nonprofit dedicated to protecting endangered forests. (And then there’s the Forest Stewardship Council – FSC – just to make things even more complicated, as highlighted in this NY Times article.)
Both ForestEthics and the Sierra club have filed complaints against SFI at both the Federal Trade Commission and the Internal Revenue Service. The organizations accused the certification program of lax standards and deceptive marketing intended to obscure responsible foresting standards. But this ongoing war came to a head at last week’s Greenbuild conference.
Greenbuild, the world’s largest green building conference, took place in Phoenix, Arizona and featured Al Gore as the keynote speaker. The day after Gore urged his audience to crack down on greenwashing, ForestEthics released a large floating banner exposing SFI (pictured above). It read “SFI=Greenbuild wash.” Personally, I think they could’ve come up with something much more clever and descriptive, but that’s just my opinion.
In addition to their [somewhat lame] sign, ForestEthics ran an ad in USA Today’s Phoenix edition on the conference’s opening day, spotlighting SFI’s “greenwashing practice” of certifying forest destruction as “sustainable”. Copies of this ad (seen here) and a brochure detailing SFI’s shortcomings circulated throughout estimated 25,000 people at the conference.
The Washington Forest Law Center in Seattle is the legal firm that filed the complaints against SFI. It’s director, Peter Goldman, believes that “They’ve essentially created a green certification system to promote their sales… We believe S.F.I. has confused the marketplace.”