<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Give more, Useless</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/give-more-useless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/give-more-useless/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Gia</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/give-more-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-20578</link> <dc:creator>Gia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:30:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18065#comment-20578</guid> <description>This so interesting - it is a conflict I struggle with every day.  As the owner of a for-profit online shop, I should be promoting consumerism.  However, I really do believe that people should only buy things that they really need or otherwise would have bought elsewhere.  I blogged about this on Blog Action Day in my post &quot;Buying Green is an Oxymoron.&quot;  http://is.gd/4XbKx  I hope you don&#039;t see this as shameless self promotion - I truly am conflicted about this!  But like Mark, we hope to help people make responsible choices.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This so interesting &#8211; it is a conflict I struggle with every day.  As the owner of a for-profit online shop, I should be promoting consumerism.  However, I really do believe that people should only buy things that they really need or otherwise would have bought elsewhere.  I blogged about this on Blog Action Day in my post &#8220;Buying Green is an Oxymoron.&#8221; <a
href="http://is.gd/4XbKx" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/4XbKx</a> I hope you don&#8217;t see this as shameless self promotion &#8211; I truly am conflicted about this!  But like Mark, we hope to help people make responsible choices.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mark</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/give-more-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-20239</link> <dc:creator>mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18065#comment-20239</guid> <description>As co-founder of USELESS I thought letting you know a bit of the thinking behind the company might help some shed light on our evil ways.We&#039;re definitely not anti-consumerism - stopping people buying stuff is a tide we can&#039;t hope to change - but we do believe in responsible consumerism. There&#039;s nothing wrong with buying things, but what we choose to buy can make a big difference. And our goal is simply to encourage people to think about the choices they make. All USELESS products are utilitarian, well-designed, built to last, made sustainably and manufactured in the good old US of A. And there aren&#039;t many product lines out there that can say that.So really we&#039;re just trying to demonstrate a way thinking about products through the products themselves. By the way, we thought the &quot;anti-consumerism&quot; label might come up when we first launched and mention it in the FAQ section of the website at useless.org (in the &quot;about us&quot; section).As for the dot org comment, we did try and get the dot com but couldn&#039;t so went for dot org instead. We had also considered going the non-profit route, but want to grow a business that does good and felt too constrained by being a not for profit.We love conversations like this. We don&#039;t think we&#039;re perfect, but nor are we cynically trying to manipulate any one. Buy our products not because they&#039;ll save the world (they won&#039;t), but because they are well-made and serve a useful function (yes, even the notebooks do and are made from 100% post consumer waste). Yes, 10% of profits go to fund water and sanitation projects in the developing world but we&#039;ll only ever help a few thousand of the 2.6 billion going without, so what we can do is just a drop in the ocean. But at least we&#039;re trying.Thanks for listening. All suggestions on how to make ourselves better please send them to mark@useless.orgMark</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As co-founder of USELESS I thought letting you know a bit of the thinking behind the company might help some shed light on our evil ways.</p><p>We&#8217;re definitely not anti-consumerism &#8211; stopping people buying stuff is a tide we can&#8217;t hope to change &#8211; but we do believe in responsible consumerism. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with buying things, but what we choose to buy can make a big difference. And our goal is simply to encourage people to think about the choices they make. All USELESS products are utilitarian, well-designed, built to last, made sustainably and manufactured in the good old US of A. And there aren&#8217;t many product lines out there that can say that.</p><p>So really we&#8217;re just trying to demonstrate a way thinking about products through the products themselves. By the way, we thought the &#8220;anti-consumerism&#8221; label might come up when we first launched and mention it in the FAQ section of the website at useless.org (in the &#8220;about us&#8221; section).</p><p>As for the dot org comment, we did try and get the dot com but couldn&#8217;t so went for dot org instead. We had also considered going the non-profit route, but want to grow a business that does good and felt too constrained by being a not for profit.</p><p>We love conversations like this. We don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re perfect, but nor are we cynically trying to manipulate any one. Buy our products not because they&#8217;ll save the world (they won&#8217;t), but because they are well-made and serve a useful function (yes, even the notebooks do and are made from 100% post consumer waste). Yes, 10% of profits go to fund water and sanitation projects in the developing world but we&#8217;ll only ever help a few thousand of the 2.6 billion going without, so what we can do is just a drop in the ocean. But at least we&#8217;re trying.</p><p>Thanks for listening. All suggestions on how to make ourselves better please send them to <a
href="mailto:mark@useless.org">mark@useless.org</a></p><p>Mark</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/give-more-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-20228</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:35:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18065#comment-20228</guid> <description>Good points. I think you got it right, Kristen (comment)--while these are still products, people are still going to buy at least some stuff, and buying this stuff is better than buying other people&#039;s stuff.  Useless also advocates reusing stuff and not buying new if you can keep using something you already have, &quot;but if you&#039;ve gotta buy stuff, buy this better stuff...&quot;Audrey, you&#039;re right.  The .org thing is kinda misleading for a for-profit company. Let&#039;s hope they&#039;re working on getting .com instead.  Looks like someone else already has &quot;useless.com&quot; and might be holding out for a juicy ransom.  Ugh.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. I think you got it right, Kristen (comment)&#8211;while these are still products, people are still going to buy at least some stuff, and buying this stuff is better than buying other people&#8217;s stuff.  Useless also advocates reusing stuff and not buying new if you can keep using something you already have, &#8220;but if you&#8217;ve gotta buy stuff, buy this better stuff&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>Audrey, you&#8217;re right.  The .org thing is kinda misleading for a for-profit company. Let&#8217;s hope they&#8217;re working on getting .com instead.  Looks like someone else already has &#8220;useless.com&#8221; and might be holding out for a juicy ransom.  Ugh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kirsten@Nexyoo</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/give-more-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-20067</link> <dc:creator>Kirsten@Nexyoo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:43:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=18065#comment-20067</guid> <description>I agree. On the other hand, at least these are products that people actually can use and would be buying somewhere anyway...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. On the other hand, at least these are products that people actually can use and would be buying somewhere anyway&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 274/275 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-09 20:41:51 -->
