<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Seventh Generation Launches the Million Baby Crawl for Toxic Chemical Reform</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/seventh-generation-launches-the-million-baby-crawl-for-toxic-chemical-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/seventh-generation-launches-the-million-baby-crawl-for-toxic-chemical-reform/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Take Your Brand, Make a Campaign &#171; Morning Sky Public Relations</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/seventh-generation-launches-the-million-baby-crawl-for-toxic-chemical-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-27885</link> <dc:creator>Take Your Brand, Make a Campaign &#171; Morning Sky Public Relations</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=19438#comment-27885</guid> <description>[...] 7. Publicize like mad. (Examples here, here, here, here, and here.) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7. Publicize like mad. (Examples here, here, here, here, and here.) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ten Problems and Hazards of Conventional Cleaning Products</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/seventh-generation-launches-the-million-baby-crawl-for-toxic-chemical-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-24316</link> <dc:creator>Ten Problems and Hazards of Conventional Cleaning Products</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:35:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=19438#comment-24316</guid> <description>[...] the Toxic Substances Control Act (TCSA) but to date the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has tested only 200 of the more than 80,000 chemical compounds developed for all sorts of products used in the home; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Toxic Substances Control Act (TCSA) but to date the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has tested only 200 of the more than 80,000 chemical compounds developed for all sorts of products used in the home; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kathryn Siranosian</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/seventh-generation-launches-the-million-baby-crawl-for-toxic-chemical-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-21219</link> <dc:creator>Kathryn Siranosian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:43:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=19438#comment-21219</guid> <description>Well said. Thanks for adding this perspective, Charli.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. Thanks for adding this perspective, Charli.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charli</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/11/seventh-generation-launches-the-million-baby-crawl-for-toxic-chemical-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-21168</link> <dc:creator>Charli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:29:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=19438#comment-21168</guid> <description>Thanks Ms. Siranosian, for posting something about keeping our kids safe. I think making industrial chemicals safe for infants and children is something we can all get behind. Problem is: mandating more chemical testing, the kind being advocated by the Safer Chemicals coalition, will kill millions of animals, cost lots of money, and give use questionable results.Many people and scientists agree that current legislation which regulates chemicals must be reformed. However, we should also be sure to reform the science that underlies these regulations—namely, the way in which toxicity testing is conducted.Currently, toxicity testing is largely based on experiments in animals and uses methods that were developed as long ago as the 1930’s and 40’s; they and are slow, inaccurate, open to uncertainty and manipulation, and do not adequately protect human health.  These tests take anywhere from months to years, and tens of thousands to millions of dollars to perform. More importantly, the current testing paradigm has a poor record in predicting effects in humans and an even poorer record in leading to actual regulation of dangerous chemicals.Fortunately, many scientists have worked, and are working, on addressing these problems -- and alternatives to animal testing exist in a powerful way. Chemical reform should not only modernize policy, but modernize the science that supports that policy. Let&#039;s ensure Kids-Safe uses all the necessary tools to truly make our children, our environment, and animals safe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ms. Siranosian, for posting something about keeping our kids safe. I think making industrial chemicals safe for infants and children is something we can all get behind. Problem is: mandating more chemical testing, the kind being advocated by the Safer Chemicals coalition, will kill millions of animals, cost lots of money, and give use questionable results.</p><p>Many people and scientists agree that current legislation which regulates chemicals must be reformed. However, we should also be sure to reform the science that underlies these regulations—namely, the way in which toxicity testing is conducted.</p><p>Currently, toxicity testing is largely based on experiments in animals and uses methods that were developed as long ago as the 1930’s and 40’s; they and are slow, inaccurate, open to uncertainty and manipulation, and do not adequately protect human health.  These tests take anywhere from months to years, and tens of thousands to millions of dollars to perform. More importantly, the current testing paradigm has a poor record in predicting effects in humans and an even poorer record in leading to actual regulation of dangerous chemicals.</p><p>Fortunately, many scientists have worked, and are working, on addressing these problems &#8212; and alternatives to animal testing exist in a powerful way. Chemical reform should not only modernize policy, but modernize the science that supports that policy. Let&#8217;s ensure Kids-Safe uses all the necessary tools to truly make our children, our environment, and animals safe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 274/275 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 02:46:44 -->
