<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: China’s Carbon Intensity Management Proposal: The Numbers</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/12/china%e2%80%99s-carbon-intensity-management-proposal-the-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/12/china%e2%80%99s-carbon-intensity-management-proposal-the-numbers/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bill Roth</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/12/china%e2%80%99s-carbon-intensity-management-proposal-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-21910</link> <dc:creator>Bill Roth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:29:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=20249#comment-21910</guid> <description>Thank you Zhuubaajie for your comment. Allocating emission levels on an average per person seems to reward those who are creating more people. Is that a good goal for our world? More people, more emissions doesn&#039;t seem like a substainable solution for the world. And playing the blame game will result in all of us losing. The good news is that Chinese and American entreperneurs are focused upon developing solutions that ideally our leaders will facilitate with their public policies.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Zhuubaajie for your comment. Allocating emission levels on an average per person seems to reward those who are creating more people. Is that a good goal for our world? More people, more emissions doesn&#8217;t seem like a substainable solution for the world. And playing the blame game will result in all of us losing. The good news is that Chinese and American entreperneurs are focused upon developing solutions that ideally our leaders will facilitate with their public policies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zhuubaajie</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/12/china%e2%80%99s-carbon-intensity-management-proposal-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-21879</link> <dc:creator>Zhuubaajie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:36:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=20249#comment-21879</guid> <description>How about playing fair for a change, and set a world average per capita for carbon emissions - the SAME NUMBER per man, woman, and child, and tax according to the overage?  The West created this current mess through centuries of industrial development, and it is injustice to demand that the rest of the world suffer for it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about playing fair for a change, and set a world average per capita for carbon emissions &#8211; the SAME NUMBER per man, woman, and child, and tax according to the overage?  The West created this current mess through centuries of industrial development, and it is injustice to demand that the rest of the world suffer for it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 240/241 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 02:29:37 -->
