« Back to Home Page

Sign up for the 3p daily dispatch:

Why Humans Are Wired for Systems Thinking

| Thursday December 10th, 2009 | 5 Comments

preidio-buzz-bar.gif

B0004164 Neurons in the brain - illustrationBy David Jay
During a recent lecture at the Presidio Graduate School’s MBA program my professor gave us a taste of systems thinking. In a PowerPoint slide with text too small to read, he showed us a nest of boxes and arrows, stocks and flows describing just a few of the millions of complicated relationships between a company, its environment and the society in which it operates. Systems thinking, he explained, is about taking all of these complex interconnections into account—a daunting task for an oversimplified system that is too dense to read, let alone memorize or fully understand.

It’s my personal belief that at its core, systems thinking is a lot simpler—maybe even instinctual. This view of systems thinking comes from the Ngorongoro crater in northern Tanzania, where I stood just a week before viewing my professor’s PowerPoint slide. Covered in grass, zebras and thick brambles, Ngorongoro is in the stomping grounds of human evolution, where we acquired the big brains that have let us build such miraculous (and destructive) systems across the globe. Staring down hippos and herds of wildebeest, I reflected on what we evolved those big brains for.

The famous research of a man named Robert Dunbar indicates that our big frontal lobes are designed by nature to deal with a very specific type of complex system. Dunbar found that brain size in animals correlates directly to the size of herd or group that an animal lives in. If you’re in a zebra herd or an ant colony you don’t need to think that hard—you just need to react instinctually to the other animals around you. But if you’re in a wolf pack or a monkey troupe, things are different. You have to pay attention to ever-shifting hierarchies and alliances in the group. There are dynamic relationships to navigate and politics to understand, and that understanding takes grey matter.

The advantages are obvious—complex groups can respond dynamically to their environment, strategically seizing on opportunities and fending off threats. Humans have big brains so that we can think about relationships and communities, and we are incredibly, incredibly good at it. For an illustration of exactly how good, ask a 14-year old girl to explain the complex system of friendships and romantic relationships in her social group. You’ll get an answer whose complexity puts six-figure stock analysts to shame.

This implies that there could be a much more intuitive way to approach systems thinking than my professor’s daunting PowerPoint slide: approach a complicated system like you would get to know a community. Focus on building relationships, human and otherwise, and let those relationships evolve until you understand how they interconnect. Tell and listen to stories. For many of us this process is intuitive. How many of us have computers that “like” to behave a certain way or that “don’t get along” with their printers? Human relationships are potent metaphors for how complex systems work because they’re what we’ve evolved to understand.

What does it mean to approach complex systems like communities? A few guiding principles might include:

1) Relationships can always become deeper. You never fully understand your best friend or the soil that grows your crops.
2) You can understand someone by understanding their other relationships. You get to know someone new by asking about their family, their job, their passions, and all of the other things that bind them to the world. You get to know soil the same way.
3) Don’t take relationships for granted. The more that you rely on someone or something, the more you can benefit from a deep understanding of them or it.
4) Prioritize the relationships that put you in balance. In an infinitely complicated world, focus on building an understanding of the relationships that allow you to survive and thrive.
5) Look for integration. Strong communities are built on things that benefit lots of relationships at once. If you know how to look for them, such opportunities usually abound. Note: Be wary of a good thing that benefits one relationship at the expense of others.

David Jay
David Jay is an MBA candidate with the Presidio Graduate School in San Francisco, CA. He has a background in web product development with VolunteerMatch.org and in online community building with the Asexual Visibility and Education Network. He is passionate about using social technology to advance discussion around mounting global water issues.


▼▼▼      5 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup
  • http://www.bethrobinson.me Beth Robinson

    Great post, David. I like the correlation of the abstract theory to something most of us understand. If you keep following that mental model then you'll also capture a number of the key principles in systems thinking such as delayed effects.

    My disqus profile goes to my personal homepage, but I blog about systems thinking and innovation at http://www.inventingelephants.com

  • http://flowingmotion.wordpress.com/ Jo Jordan

    I like your drawing out of the practical considerations.. I shall keep this and work on it!!

  • boagie

    Excellent idea, I am new to the study of general systems theory, this idea is most helpful. Is there in fact a inversely proportional relation between brain size and the community that that biological multicellular/community finds itself within? Sounds like almost a rule for systems within systems, perhaps just for the understanding system within a larger system. Community as a holomovement–lol!! The idea needs expanded upon but great stuff, thanks for the light.

  • boagie

    Excellent idea, I am new to the study of general systems theory, this idea is most helpful. Is there in fact a inversely proportional relation between brain size and the community that that biological multicellular/community finds itself within? Sounds like almost a rule for systems within systems, perhaps just for the understanding system within a larger system. Community as a holomovement–lol!! The idea needs expanded upon but great stuff, thanks for the light.

  • http://www.healthyworkplaces.com Mallary Tytel

    Hi David, thanks for this posting. Systems thinking has always been intuitive (and implicit) to me. In addition to interrelationships and connections I also keep an eye out for patterns, which can tell me a great deal about the system – or any community, too! Cheers!