<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How Google’s China Pullout Shows Their Triple Bottom Line</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Introducing Twitter’s New Censorship Policy</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-102314</link> <dc:creator>Introducing Twitter’s New Censorship Policy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:10:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-102314</guid> <description>[...] that the real reason? Do you just want to appear more compliant with censorship requests so you can penetrate China?Photo credits: Flickr user, stevegarfield 0 Comments&#171; Previous post: Landfills: From Beast to [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the real reason? Do you just want to appear more compliant with censorship requests so you can penetrate China?Photo credits: Flickr user, stevegarfield 0 Comments&laquo; Previous post: Landfills: From Beast to [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Who Are the Top 10 Most &#8216;Sustainable&#8217; CEOs? &#124; CleanTechies Blog - CleanTechies.com</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-24291</link> <dc:creator>Who Are the Top 10 Most &#8216;Sustainable&#8217; CEOs? &#124; CleanTechies Blog - CleanTechies.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:53:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-24291</guid> <description>[...] tongue in cheek. From green buildings &amp; data centers, to donating millions to worthy causes, to standing up to the Chinese government, Google earns a prominent position on this list. Not manufacturing anything physical might make [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tongue in cheek. From green buildings &amp; data centers, to donating millions to worthy causes, to standing up to the Chinese government, Google earns a prominent position on this list. Not manufacturing anything physical might make [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: richmedium</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-40174</link> <dc:creator>richmedium</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:39:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-40174</guid> <description>I agree. This is huge overstatement, and not helpful at all to anyone.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This is huge overstatement, and not helpful at all to anyone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: richmedium</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-23728</link> <dc:creator>richmedium</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:39:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-23728</guid> <description>I agree. This is huge overstatement, and not helpful at all to anyone.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This is huge overstatement, and not helpful at all to anyone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: richbruer</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-23643</link> <dc:creator>richbruer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:37:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-23643</guid> <description>Thanks Jen. Thinking of TBL in that way would include Google&#039;s decision in China. Semantics aside, I do join you in applauding Google. Now if they could just eliminate that pesky little carbon footprint of theirs :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jen. Thinking of TBL in that way would include Google&#39;s decision in China. Semantics aside, I do join you in applauding Google. Now if they could just eliminate that pesky little carbon footprint of theirs :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Mickle</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-23636</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Mickle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:30:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-23636</guid> <description>I agree that Google is one of few publicly traded companies which is challenging the claim that a company only exists to serve the quarterly financial expectations of Wall Street. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is quite a bit of controversy about Google&#039;s recent move and its motivations, but if you remember back to when Google agreed to censor in China, it was met with tremendous criticism, as the first example of an idealistic don&#039;t-be-evil company selling out. Now it has backpedaled and is using the weight of everything it has done in China to start a conversation about the basic human right to free speech that needed a push. And now Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is elevating the conversation, thanks to Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Too often, Triple Bottom Line business gets confused with philanthropic check writing and solar panel installations (both examples of qualities that exist only in the periphery of a technology company that is comprised by people, offices, and data centers, not manufacturing operations). Yet, the true impact or potential of business exists in the core of its operations, and I believe that Google, in this case, is leveraging its expert team of progressive lawyers to bet on China&#039;s right to free speech. For those who want to be on the cutting edge of triple bottom line thinking, watch Google.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Google is one of few publicly traded companies which is challenging the claim that a company only exists to serve the quarterly financial expectations of Wall Street.</p><p>There is quite a bit of controversy about Google&#39;s recent move and its motivations, but if you remember back to when Google agreed to censor in China, it was met with tremendous criticism, as the first example of an idealistic don&#39;t-be-evil company selling out. Now it has backpedaled and is using the weight of everything it has done in China to start a conversation about the basic human right to free speech that needed a push. And now Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is elevating the conversation, thanks to Google.</p><p>Too often, Triple Bottom Line business gets confused with philanthropic check writing and solar panel installations (both examples of qualities that exist only in the periphery of a technology company that is comprised by people, offices, and data centers, not manufacturing operations). Yet, the true impact or potential of business exists in the core of its operations, and I believe that Google, in this case, is leveraging its expert team of progressive lawyers to bet on China&#39;s right to free speech. For those who want to be on the cutting edge of triple bottom line thinking, watch Google.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jen Boynton</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-23630</link> <dc:creator>Jen Boynton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-23630</guid> <description>Thanks for your feedback Ryan. I think the 3BL is innately about bringing ethics back into business and looking at more than financial return.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your feedback Ryan. I think the 3BL is innately about bringing ethics back into business and looking at more than financial return.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fccchina发安全警告，微软拒绝与谷歌联手叫板&#124;文通博客</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-23621</link> <dc:creator>fccchina发安全警告，微软拒绝与谷歌联手叫板&#124;文通博客</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:37:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-23621</guid> <description>[...]  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: richbruer</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-23620</link> <dc:creator>richbruer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:23:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-23620</guid> <description>Why do you say this is such an exemplary TBL example? This may be a laudable example of business ethics or of leading with mission, but I&#039;m missing the TBL connection.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you say this is such an exemplary TBL example? This may be a laudable example of business ethics or of leading with mission, but I&#39;m missing the TBL connection.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the: internet and china &#171; project: transparence</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/01/how-google%e2%80%99s-decision-to-pull-out-of-china-proves-they%e2%80%99ve-got-a-triple-bottom-line-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-23614</link> <dc:creator>the: internet and china &#171; project: transparence</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:26:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=24754#comment-23614</guid> <description>[...] for more interesting reads &#8211; triplepundit wraps up Google&#8217;s tenuous history in China and their current actions [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for more interesting reads &#8211; triplepundit wraps up Google&#8217;s tenuous history in China and their current actions [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 376/381 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-10 03:54:10 -->
