<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Cleantech Open – A Bridge over the Valley of Death?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/</link> <description>Business, Better. Since 2005</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Alan hosoff</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/comment-page-1/#comment-102087</link> <dc:creator>Alan hosoff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=28386#comment-102087</guid> <description>its all nonesense. the greenest thing chevron can do is go out of business. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its all nonesense. the greenest thing chevron can do is go out of business. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The problem with fuel cells &#124; SmartPlanet</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/comment-page-1/#comment-84591</link> <dc:creator>The problem with fuel cells &#124; SmartPlanet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:37:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=28386#comment-84591</guid> <description>[...] It&#8217;s not unlike a lithium ion battery &#8212; except way more expensive. Can fuel cell startups convince investors that their products are robust enough to bridge the &#8220;valley of death&#8221;? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s not unlike a lithium ion battery &#8212; except way more expensive. Can fuel cell startups convince investors that their products are robust enough to bridge the &#8220;valley of death&#8221;? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Triple Pundit: The Cleantech Open – A Bridge over the Valley of Death? &#124; Sensible City</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/comment-page-1/#comment-25941</link> <dc:creator>Triple Pundit: The Cleantech Open – A Bridge over the Valley of Death? &#124; Sensible City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=28386#comment-25941</guid> <description>[...] [Read entire article at 3P] [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Read entire article at 3P] [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neno Duplan</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/comment-page-1/#comment-40323</link> <dc:creator>Neno Duplan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:05:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=28386#comment-40323</guid> <description>This is a very nice summary of challenges facing startups. I agree with Mr. Davis assertion that &quot;chasm&quot; is becoming wider. In my business of environmental information management I have seen over last 10 years many startups come and go. Part of the reason is explained in Mr. Davis article and boils down to the following: How could company of size of Chevron trust a startup company to organize and manage vast quantities of environmental data and information accumulated over last 20 years in their consultant’s desktops? We signed contract with Chevron in 2003 and are still collecting data. Most startup, no matter how well funded, don&#039;t make it to the other side of the chasm. We are currently witnessing herd (bubble) mentality around GHG accounting with new startups popping up on weekly basis. I wonder how many will be around five years from now?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very nice summary of challenges facing startups. I agree with Mr. Davis assertion that &#8220;chasm&#8221; is becoming wider. In my business of environmental information management I have seen over last 10 years many startups come and go. Part of the reason is explained in Mr. Davis article and boils down to the following: How could company of size of Chevron trust a startup company to organize and manage vast quantities of environmental data and information accumulated over last 20 years in their consultant’s desktops? We signed contract with Chevron in 2003 and are still collecting data. Most startup, no matter how well funded, don&#39;t make it to the other side of the chasm. We are currently witnessing herd (bubble) mentality around GHG accounting with new startups popping up on weekly basis. I wonder how many will be around five years from now?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neno Duplan</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/comment-page-1/#comment-25516</link> <dc:creator>Neno Duplan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:05:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=28386#comment-25516</guid> <description>This is a very nice summary of challenges facing startups. I agree with Mr. Davis assertion that &quot;chasm&quot; is becoming wider. In my business of environmental information management I have seen over last 10 years many startups come and go. Part of the reason is explained in Mr. Davis article and boils down to the following: How could company of size of Chevron trust a startup company to organize and manage vast quantities of environmental data and information accumulated over last 20 years in their consultant’s desktops? We signed contract with Chevron in 2003 and are still collecting data. Most startup, no matter how well funded, don&#039;t make it to the other side of the chasm. We are currently witnessing herd (bubble) mentality around GHG accounting with new startups popping up on weekly basis. I wonder how many will be around five years from now?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very nice summary of challenges facing startups. I agree with Mr. Davis assertion that &#8220;chasm&#8221; is becoming wider. In my business of environmental information management I have seen over last 10 years many startups come and go. Part of the reason is explained in Mr. Davis article and boils down to the following: How could company of size of Chevron trust a startup company to organize and manage vast quantities of environmental data and information accumulated over last 20 years in their consultant’s desktops? We signed contract with Chevron in 2003 and are still collecting data. Most startup, no matter how well funded, don&#39;t make it to the other side of the chasm. We are currently witnessing herd (bubble) mentality around GHG accounting with new startups popping up on weekly basis. I wonder how many will be around five years from now?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Shires</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/comment-page-1/#comment-25407</link> <dc:creator>Dave Shires</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:41:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=28386#comment-25407</guid> <description>Great to see Chevron supporting this.  I&#039;m curious to hear Chevron&#039;s position on things like efficiency, alternative fuels, especially non-fossil fuels - as so much of the clean tech open is about mastering these new technologies.  Would Chevron continue to support startups in these fields? Would they buy these small innovators? If so, would it be to gobble them up, or to add to their own innovation - one which I hope sees the end of oil sometime in the not too distant future!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see Chevron supporting this.  I&#39;m curious to hear Chevron&#39;s position on things like efficiency, alternative fuels, especially non-fossil fuels &#8211; as so much of the clean tech open is about mastering these new technologies.  Would Chevron continue to support startups in these fields? Would they buy these small innovators? If so, would it be to gobble them up, or to add to their own innovation &#8211; one which I hope sees the end of oil sometime in the not too distant future!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jerry Jones</title><link>http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/cleantech-open/comment-page-1/#comment-25290</link> <dc:creator>Jerry Jones</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:54:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.triplepundit.com/?p=28386#comment-25290</guid> <description>Great article. Good to see Chevron stepping up to the plate to support startup entrepreneurs in a meaningful way. We&#039;ll see how this translates into real progress in renewable energy for the oil giant.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Good to see Chevron stepping up to the plate to support startup entrepreneurs in a meaningful way. We&#39;ll see how this translates into real progress in renewable energy for the oil giant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 325/326 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.triplepundit.com @ 2012-02-09 20:34:07 -->
