Virgin Galactic Defends Space Tourism’s Environmental Benefitsby Leon Kaye on Friday, Mar 19th, 2010 ShareClick to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)Environmental groups have heatedly lashed out at Virgin Galactic’s plans for space tourism. Criticism has reached a point at which a former senior brand advisor defended billionaire Sir Richard Branson’s brainchild, claiming that the firm’s venture will deliver long-term environmental solutions. But is Virgin’s SpaceShipTwo, as it is currently named, an expensive polluting junket serving only to give some wealthy people a decadent joyride, or will the results provide scientific benefits that ultimately will heal the planet?The evidence suggests both.Indeed, space exploration is an expensive, fuel-intensive, and polluting venture. Rockets and spacecraft need liquid hydrogen fuel, which at first appears to be clean-burning. However, one kilogram of liquid hydrogen requires 15 kilowatt hours of electricity, and a space shuttle launch blasts about 113 tons of it at takeoff: the equivalent of what 130 American homes’ electricity need for an entire year. Add the 28 tons of carbon and 23 tons of particulates that are belched around Florida’s Kennedy Space Center, and you have a very dirty science program.Nevertheless, Virgin’s claims do merit credibility. Look up “Richard Branson and environment” on your favorite search engine, and find that Branson has been speaking about combating climate change long before it was fashionable. Allan Knight, Virgin Galactic’s advisor, points out that rocket materials’ technology has not changed in the past 30 years, so Virgin’s research should develop lighter components that manufactures will use in future passenger flight airplanes, reducing fuel consumption and emissions. The aviation industry, of course, also has ties to military research and development. There is an argument for military spending resulting in advances in battery technology and lighter aircraft materials. So advances in aviation and military research can trickle down to civilian use. But at what ROI, especially for a vehicle that currently can take six passengers at a time?Virgin Galactic comes across as more of a well-rehearsed public relations machine than a green technology company. The venture claims that future spaceship model could operate using renewable fuels or solar power, without explaining exactly how. Algae may sound like a great alternative for fueling a Virgin spaceship, but currently the producing one part of algae requires 1000 parts of water, and right now algae biofuels can not scale to the the aviation industry’s needs. By giving celebrities and wealthy tourist-astronauts views from space, Virgin also touts that the pictures will turn us all into environmentalists. Shelling out US$200,000 for such a tour however, appears indulgent: and anyone living near the noxious port of Los Angeles, Nigeria’s oil fields, or in the dust bowls scarring Australia can tell you that abundant evidence exists suggesting that the earth is confronting severe pressure from an over-consumption of resources and fuel.Green auditing is a growing field, and has the potential to employ more university finance majors. If any project is ripe for such a rigorous evaluation, it’s Virgin Gallactic. Based in Fresno, California, Leon Kaye is a business writer and strategic communications specialist. He has also been featured in The Guardian, Sustainable Brands and CleanTechnica. When he has time, he shares his thoughts on his own site, GreenGoPost.com. Contact him at email@example.com. You can also reach out via Twitter (@LeonKaye) and Instagram (GreenGoPost). Follow Leon Kaye @leonkaye 6 responses Ermm – it's Richard BrAnson… not BrOnson Space development and exploration seems genuinely peaceful. I impose much less on the world's population. I used to think that the whole space race was a pointless waste of money. Space development and exploration seems genuinely peaceful. I impose much less on the world's population. I used to think that the whole space race was a pointless waste of money. I think space tourism is the only great thing about tourism that really matters in the past 50 years.I would go on a space cruise if I can call it like that If I would have the money._________________________________________________________________________hotels in London No I am not talking about the dark black area above us that we see at night. I am talking about the space of the photograph within the borders of the photo. You see there are various areas that you can use the space in your photograph. If you know how to use the space in your photo right you can take much better shots. If you don't use the space right you can end up with photos that just seem off and are not visually pleasing. why would this be a waste of money now….??? Comments are closed.