« Back to Home Page

Don’t Get Bamboozled: How to Respond to the FTC’s Recent Crackdown on Greenwashing

3p Contributor | Monday April 5th, 2010 | 5 Comments

By: Michael Wolfe, Director, Environmental Certification Services Scientific Certification Systems

Since the Federal Trade Commission sent warning letters to 78 companies advising them to stop illegally labeling and advertising rayon products as “bamboo,” manufacturers and retailers have been wondering if this signals a widespread greenwash crackdown.

The risk is clear—the textile market, for example, has enough green claims to make an eco-conscious consumer’s head spin. Labels claim that products are recyclable, biodegradable, eco-friendly and more. The FTC has focused on the textile industry because there is great consumer demand for environmentally-preferable fabrics–and there’s also plenty of confusion in the marketplace. The FTC has even created a guide called “Avoid Bamboo-zling Your Customers” to help manufacturers avoid making false claims and a corresponding “Have you been bamboozled?”consumer alert.

We have worked in the area of environmental claims and in the textile industry long enough to see some patterns in regulation and to see some ways to navigate the uncertainty. When manufacturers make statements about the green qualities of their products, they need to make  sure they can back up the claims with cold hard data. The FTC has said that it is targeting unsubstantiated claims. Pick up a “recycled content” labeled product in any store, and it’s likely to simply say “recycled content,” without any information about what percentage is recycled content, or what that really means

The best advice in this age of unprecedented transparency is to make verifiable claims. As tempting as it may be to advertise a fabric as “natural” or “sustainable,” it is clear that even though a product starts from bamboo material, an environmentally damaging process transforms it into rayon. Whether a disingenuous claim results in consumer backlash or FTC fines, it is can be avoided with common sense.

Be critical when shopping for a certification. For example, Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is an independent certification for responsibly harvested wood that was developed with input from NGO stakeholders, while Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) is industry sponsored. It’s not hard to guess which one is more rigorous. Don’t just rely on other people’s claims either. You can get in trouble for making claims about a product because somewhere upstream in the supply chain, someone did not comply with the claim.


▼▼▼      5 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup

Comments

  1. April 06, 2010 at 15:59 pm PDT | dwarose writes:

    Hmmmm….let's see…you have an editorial from a writer who works for Scientific Certification Systems–which is a co-founder of Forest Stewardship Council–and who makes his money from certifying forests for Forest Stewardship Council, saying that you should only purchase wood certified by Forest Stewardship Council. I'll buy it!

    Oh…I get it! He’s testing us. After telling us about “unsubstantiated claims”, he’s giving us a real-world example. In the last paragraph he makes unsubstantiated claims about Forest Stewardship Council and Sustainable Forestry Initiative. Bravo! Almost fooled me. Do I get an A+?

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

    • April 07, 2010 at 3:11 am PDT | rga writes:

      Good observation dwarose!
      This whole argument is not about sustainability, it's about $$$ and market share.
      Wolfe's article is “industry sponsored” so don't get Bamboozled!

      Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  2. April 07, 2010 at 7:35 am PDT | Tom Stodola writes:

    With so many eco-claims out there, I don't believe most of them, preferring to focus only on those that have specific data to back up their claims.

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  3. April 07, 2010 at 10:11 am PDT | rga writes:

    Good observation dwarose!
    This whole argument is not about sustainability, it's about $$$ and market share.
    Wolfe's article is “industry sponsored” so don't get Bamboozled!

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  4. April 07, 2010 at 14:35 pm PDT | Tom Stodola writes:

    With so many eco-claims out there, I don't believe most of them, preferring to focus only on those that have specific data to back up their claims.

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

Leave a Reply

  1. Please leave an intelligent comment. You are welcomed to link to your company or website, but entirely self promotional posts will be marked as spam.
There are 3 ways to comment on 3P

2. Facebook Users

Login to your Facebook account

3. Members

Register for an account or login.

Subscribe to Comments

  1. June 28, 11 at 1:02 am PDT | Marketingsherpa Blog » Green Marketing: How to tap into a $3.5 trillion market writes:

    [...] That’s a pretty harsh list of what not to do. And hopefully it helps you avoid any warning letters or fines from the Federal Trade Commission. [...]

  2. January 07, 13 at 2:05 am PDT | FTC Settles With Amazon, Sears, Macy's Over Mislabeled Bamboo Clothing writes:

    [...] (FTC) reached an agreement with four large retailers over charges that textiles the companies promoted as environmentally friendly “bamboo” were actually rayon. Sears, Amazon, Macy’s and Max Studio (Leon Max) agreed to pay a total of [...]