« Back to Home Page

Sign up for the 3p daily dispatch:

Besieged Climate Bill Due Out Tomorrow

| Tuesday May 11th, 2010 | 3 Comments

Senators John Kerry and Joe Lieberman plan to introduce their climate bill tomorrow, three weeks later than first planned and in a political landscape thrown into chaos by the Gulf oil spill, leading many to conclude the bill’s prospects are about as dim as a bad air day in Beijing.

The bill suffered its first set back in late April when Senator Lindsey Graham, its sole Republican sponsor, yanked his support after the Democrats announced they would pursue controversial immigration reform at the same time as the climate bill.

Then the Gulf oil spill happened — and then really happened, when news got out that the leak was much bigger than first assumed — making one of the core planks of the climate bill, expanded drilling, politically indigestible for Democrats who might have once supported a compromise with pro-drilling Republicans.

Finally, on Monday the curtain went up on a yet another complicating factor, President Obama’s nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. Kagan’s confirmation hearings are expected to take up a lot of the Senate’s precious, precious time this summer — time that could be spent haggling over legislation.

Meanwhile, the bill has been sent to the US EPA for an economic analysis which must be completed before it can be debated on the Senate floor, a review which could take another four weeks.

But what’s in it?

We’ve noted some of the bill’s key elements before, including a form of cap and trade for some industries, incentives for alternative energy and carbon capture technologies, loan guarantees for nuclear power plants, and expanded offshore drilling.

The bill supposedly seeks to reduce emissions 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, the same as the Waxman-Markey bill that passed the House last summer. It may handcuff the EPA from imposing its own limits on greenhouse gases, and it may place a tariff on imports from countries that do not have equally stringent emissions rules, in hopes of keeping American products cost-competitive.

The expanded drilling provision — expanded beyond what President Obama already proposed last month (and is currently backing away from) — is the most buzz-worthy provision in the bill right now, for obvious reasons.

But according to Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute in a group op-ed in the New York Times Monday, the bill was doomed from the start, and “BP’s big oil spill in the Gulf changes very little.”

On the other hand, Lieberman, the bill’s co-sponsor, said “we’ve got a real shot at this” on Fox News Sunday, which is apparently the place to go when you’ve got really important environmental policy news.

Given the topsy-turvy state of climate politics right now, nothing is surprising anymore.


▼▼▼      3 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup
  • Rob Bryan

    I think an important point here is that Senator Graham did not withdrawal his support of the bill because he no longer supported the bill. He withdrew it because of political dealing. So whatever he thought he was going to get out of supporting it was taken away or something like that. Regardless of how one feels about climate change, recognize that Graham is putting his own interests and that of his party above those of the environment and humanity.

    I hope it's a fatal error, politically. Business, ALL business, whether republican, democrat, or whatever, needs to know what the rules going forward are. Clearly these people (Graham in particular) put their reelection and private agendas above humanities's need for a habitable planet.

    • BC Upham

      …on the other hand, one could argue that Harry Reid put his own interests in front of the environment and humanity by pushing immigration reform (in hopes of garnering the Hispanic vote in his reelection campaign).

  • Rob Bryan

    I think an important point here is that Senator Graham did not withdrawal his support of the bill because he no longer supported the bill. He withdrew it because of political dealing. So whatever he thought he was going to get out of supporting it was taken away or something like that. Regardless of how one feels about climate change, recognize that Graham is putting his own interests and that of his party above those of the environment and humanity.

    I hope it's a fatal error, politically. Business, ALL business, whether republican, democrat, or whatever, needs to know what the rules going forward are. Clearly these people (Graham in particular) put their reelection and private agendas above humanities's need for a habitable planet.