Community Based Marketing: Lessons from Harley Davidson and Zipcar)

By Amie Vaccaro | June 15th, 2010 4 Comments

Lara Lee, principal at Jump Associates, led one of the best panels of Sustainable Brands 2010.  During the session, Lee divulged how to build successful community based environmental marketing initiatives and new product adoption.

Five rules to speed adoption

Lee noted five things to speed adoption of a new green product, service, or idea:

  1. Relative advantage: Discuss benefits to me, not the planet.  Zipcar famously changed its advertising from “green-focused” to “people-focused” to much success.
  2. Compatibility: Relate green to familiar values, not sacrifice.  No one wants to sacrifice to be environmentally friendly.  Zipcar refers to the freedom it provides.
  3. Complexity: Simplify green decision-making through shared narratives.  In Zipcar’s example, it related the service to a gym service, which people understood readily.
  4. Trialability: Engage people to give green a try.  Zipcar offers trial memberships.
  5. Observability:  Increase visibility of the product or service by sharing it in shared spaces.  In Zipcar’s example, you see Zipcar all over, making it appear to have reached critical mass.


Seven rules for creating brand communities

Lee related ways to build communities around a brand, based on her experience doing exactly that at Harley Davidson.

  1. No silos: Every brand community must be part of a business strategy not just a marketing strategy.
  2. Serve the people: A brand community exists to serve the people in the community, not the business.
  3. Community builds brand: Not the other way around – engineer the community and the brand will be strong.
  4. Conflict is constructive: Smart companies embrace the conflicts that make their communities thrive.
  5. Everyone plays a role: Communities are strongest when everyone plays a role. Everyone has to give value and get value from the community.  This is what makes it sticky.
  6. The tool is not the strategy: Online networks are a tool, not a community strategy.
  7. Lose control: Communities must be of and by the people; they will defy managerial control.

How else have you been able to speed adoption through brand communities?

  1. No trackbacks yet

Comments

  1. June 15, 2010 at 13:52 pm UTC | brian writes:

    really interesting article/post. I am particurlary interested in conflict as a strategy for creating brand communities. Does this mean conflict within a comminuty (as in between Harley people) or conflict oriented against other brand communities (i.e. Harley against other bike brands)?
    just a thought
    Brian
    http://www.americancustom.com

    Reply

  2. June 15, 2010 at 15:50 pm UTC | Amie Vaccaro writes:

    Brian – good point. Thanks for your comment. I think she was referring to conflict within the community amongst community members. We can't expect peace at all times.

    Reply

  3. June 15, 2010 at 20:52 pm UTC | brian writes:

    really interesting article/post. I am particurlary interested in conflict as a strategy for creating brand communities. Does this mean conflict within a comminuty (as in between Harley people) or conflict oriented against other brand communities (i.e. Harley against other bike brands)?
    just a thought
    Brian

    Reply

  4. June 15, 2010 at 22:50 pm UTC | Amie Vaccaro writes:

    Brian – good point. Thanks for your comment. I think she was referring to conflict within the community amongst community members. We can't expect peace at all times.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  1. Please leave an intelligent comment. You are welcomed to link to your company or website, but entirely self promotional posts will be marked as spam.

Connect with Facebook

Subscribe to Comments