« Back to Home Page

Van Jones Comes Out Kicking Against Controversial California Ballot Proposition

Gina-Marie Cheeseman
| Tuesday September 28th, 2010 | 3 Comments

Enter another high profile person lending his voice to speak in opposition to Proposition 23 which would overturn California’s 2006 Global Warming Solutions Act. Van Jones, in a September 9 co-written blog post for ThinkProgress, said of the Act that it “sent a clear message to investors and businesses that clean energy will be the future economic engine for California.”

“But Texas oil interests conspired this year to upset the established consensus,” Jones and co-author, Jorge Madrid wrote. “They placed on the November ballot a measure to effectively undo the existing climate legislation.”

Van Jones said spoke to ThinkProgress on September 25 about Proposition 23, and pointed out that Koch Industries “has promoted awful environmental policies.” Just what has the good ole Texas Tea company known as Koch promoted? As Jones put it, “They’ve been literally poisoning rivers, poisoning streams, and making money off of that. They’ve promoted now this awful economic idea that if you grow new industries in California you somehow hurt the economy.” Jones sums up Koch’s environmental track record in two words: “That’s nuts.”

Ah, but Koch goes further than just degrading the environment. Take it from Jones: “And now they’re promoting bad politics by backing, I think, extreme movements in the United States.”

In funding Proposition 23, Koch is promoting more than their environmental policies. Again, let’s defer to what Jones said: “They’re bad in terms of their economic philosophy they’re trying to shove down the throats of California, and they’re bad in their politics in terms of their supporting extreme political ideas in America.”

The Tea Party movement and Prop 23

The Tea Party movement is in full swing now. An Associated Press (AP) article reported that the Sacramento, California-based Tea Party Express will start a national bus tour on October 18 “to rally voters.” The Tea Party Express, according to the AP article, “helped engineer upset election victories in Nevada, Alaska and Delaware this year.”

What does the Tea Party movement have to do with Proposition 23? David Koch, an executive of Koch Industries, according to Climate Progress, organized pro-Proposition 23 Tea party rallies and produced ads in favor of the proposition. Koch Industries also funded the Pacific Research Foundation which created studies to promote Proposition 23.

Jones asks about the November elections, “If you think things are bad now, what will happen when the people are screaming and yelling at these Tea Party events are actually in charge of your government, and in charge of your life, and in charge of your kids’ future?”

California voters will make an important decision in November when they decide whether or not to repeal the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Hopefully Californians will heed Jones’ warning: “I don’t think you want the Tea Party running your community, running your family, running your government.”

***

Our Propostion 23 series is made possible by EOS Climate – a producer of high-quality, verified emission reductions (VERs) generated from the destruction of ozone depleting substances (ODS). Please thank them for their support!


▼▼▼      3 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup
  • A. Juliper

    The interviewer mentions Coke… but do you have a link to that? Where has anyone said they are funding Prop 23? And why would they?

  • Wayne

    The key thing to keep in mind is that, according to CARB, the organization who wrote and will enforce AB32, AB 32 will do NOTHING to help global warming, will cost jobs and have a negative effect on the economy. This comes from the very people who drew it up!

    AB 32 does nothing for local pollution.

    Prop 23 leaves us with the toughest pollution laws in the country, among the toughest in the world. It will NOT increase local pollution

    If Proposition 23 is rejected, here is what will happen according to expert sources:

    •A 60 percent increase in your electricity bill according to the Southern California Public Power Authority.

    •An 8 percent increase in your natural gas bill according to CARB’s economic analysis.

    •$50,000 more for the price of a new home according to an analysis by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    •$3.7 billion a year more for gasoline and diesel according to Sierra Research.

    •A $1,000-$3,000 additional cost for a new car according to CARB and automaker studies.

    On top of all that, a study conducted for the California Small Business Roundtable found that AB 32 regulations would cost small business alone nearly $200 billion, and would result in more than 1 million lost jobs.

    The more I learn about AB 32, the more I fear it. It just gets worse. Please vote yes on Prop23.

    “”2 Guys on the Bay Area Transportation Board told the CARB people, “If you try to do what you are going to do(AB 32) we’ll have gas at $9.07 a gallon and we have freeway tolls at up to $4,500 a year to drive during rush hour.”

    “Part of the plan is to stop suburban development, get people to stop driving, make driving too expensive for people to live out there, force them to live in high-rises, condos, in the city.”

    For months, John and Ken have made Prop 23 their top priority, calling it a necessary step to stop a law they say will kill jobs and cost Californians a fortune in higher gas and energy prices. With an estimated one million listeners per week, these two guys usually manage to rally enough votes to get their way.

    The video has John and Ken explaining why they think this bill is the most important measure on the ballot.

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/39853750